Why complex problem dey come back again and again afta group don vote on wetin to fix?
For simple problem, vote dey usually enough: pipo gree on wetin dey wrong, and to fix am dey work. Complex problem
different. Di complaint wey show pass na usually symptom, so to fix am dey leave di cause for im place, and di problem go come back.
Evribodi don sit for dat kain meeting: dem make di list, dem count di votes, dem fix di top item, and notin change. Answer di question
di way room here go answer am, with seven simulated members beside you. Wetin you go end with na your own map of causes — and, against each
root wey e find, wetin dis method dey do about am, including wia e no dey do anytin.
WETIN YOU GO DO, IN FIVE STEPS
Write one cause, alone, bifor you fit see anybodi else own.
Read di oda pipo cards, and tok more clearly wetin you mean with your own.
Pick your top five ideas.
Answer, for pairs of cards: dis one dey affect dat one?
See di map wey di answers add up to — causes for left, wetin dem dey lead to for right.
Dis waka dey map tins wey dey block. Di same five steps dey map two oda tins, and room dey tok which one wen e open: future wey we want — wetin go dey true if dis one go well, wia di pair question go become dis one go help bring dat one — or actions, wia e go become dis one go make dat one easy to do and di map go tok wetin to do first. Wetin dey block na di common case and di default.
Why e dey work. Becos you dey write bifor you read, nobodi fit steer you.
Becos link need three quarters of di room, nobodi fit bury cause. Becos dem dey build di map one pair at a time, e dey show causes, no be popularity. Becos di map dey name causes and no be pipo, di pipo wey no gree about evritin else fit stand behind am.