True Causes

COMPARED

True Causes vs the Stanford Online Deliberation Platform

The Stanford Online Deliberation Platform comes from Stanford's Deliberative Democracy Lab and its Crowdsourced Democracy Team. It is a video platform for small groups, typically eight to fifteen people, built to run Deliberative Polling, the method James Fishkin developed: a representative sample of people is polled, deliberates in small groups with balanced briefing material and questions to competing experts, and is polled again. An automated moderator manages speaking queues and timed agendas so that everyone gets a fair turn, and many groups can meet in parallel. It has been used for national and city deliberations in Canada, Chile, Hong Kong, Japan and the United States.

True Causes does a different job. Deliberative Polling measures what a representative public thinks after it has deliberated. True Causes produces a map of what causes what, built by the people who know the problem, with every link decided pair by pair.

Stanford platformTrue Causes
Question it answersWhat would a representative public think after informed deliberation?What causes what? Which causes are deepest?
How people take partLive video in small groups, with an automated moderatorWriting and voting, at each person's own pace; an optional video call per group
Who takes partUsually a random, representative sampleThe people involved in the problem
What comes outOpinion before and after, and the change between themA map of causes, deepest first, with every disagreement kept on it
ScaleMany small groups in parallelRooms of up to 100 people free; any number of rooms on one question
Open sourceNoNo; hosted service
AccessThrough the Deliberative Democracy LabAnyone can open a room; free up to 100 people

When to use the Stanford platform

When a public body needs to know what a representative sample of its population concludes about policy options after hearing the arguments, and needs that result to stand up to scrutiny.

When to use True Causes

When the question is diagnostic: why a problem persists. Deliberative Polling weighs options; True Causes identifies which causes the options should target.

Using both

They fit in sequence. Map the causes with the people closest to the problem; then put the options that target the deepest causes to a representative sample.

Checked in September 2026. Product names belong to their owners. If anything here about another product is out of date or unfair, write to hello@mg.truecauses.org and we will correct it.

All comparisons · Why True Causes · Try it in five minutes