LA DOMANDA
Why do atrocities go unpunished?
Raggruppa le schede che ritieni simili. I raggruppamenti aiutano a leggere; non decidono nulla.
chiusa · torna alla fase Azioni
Stai guardando come ospite. Inserisci un nome utente per entrare e partecipare.
I raggruppamenti nascono dalla somiglianza, i nomi vengono per ultimi
Ordine canonico: collega coppie di idee che ritieni simili — i collegamenti sono simmetrici (A~B è B~A; la direzione non conta mai) e un legame vale quando lo fanno 2 membri.
perché
I collegamenti sono simmetrici — A~B è B~A. I raggruppamenti sono gli insiemi che emergono dai legami validi, e solo un raggruppamento già formato può ricevere un nome, da una persona. I tuoi collegamenti hanno una ✕ per ritirarli; non puoi togliere quelli degli altri. I raggruppamenti ordinano la bacheca e non limitano mai il voto — due schede che fanno la stessa AFFERMAZIONE vanno unite, nella fase Chiarimento.
Collegamenti e nomi si fanno mentre la fase Raggruppamento è aperta; la ← del facilitatore la riapre.
A mission is judged on casualties among peacekeepers, not among civilians
Ancora nessun intervento.
· non ancora raggruppata (38)
Nobody has ever costed prevention against the response that followed
Access requires the consent of the government doing the harming
Prevention has no budget line anywhere
Speaking publicly ends the access that lets us feed people
We compete with each other for the same appeal
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided
Each summary removes the part that would require action
Field reports are summarised three times before they reach a capital
Peacekeepers are deployed with mandates that forbid what is needed
Justice arrives after the society that needed it has gone
Money arrives when there are bodies, not before
The warnings were unmistakable long before anything was done
The same states arming a party also vote on protecting its victims
A warning that is wrong destroys the credibility of the next one
Our funding depends on the emergency continuing
Local knowledge is treated as bias and distance is treated as objectivity
So the organisation that knows most says least
Local staff take the risk and international staff hold the mandate
So warnings are hedged until they are unarguable, which is too late
Arms sales and atrocity policy sit in different ministries
The people who see it first have no route to those who decide
A donor can point at a camp and cannot point at a war that did not start
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted
Staff who witness it are bound by agreements they did not choose
Every state judges the case by what it costs them
A mission is judged on casualties among peacekeepers, not among civilians
Nobody is held accountable for a mission that watched
By the time it is a briefing it is a statistic
Early warning systems produce reports nobody is obliged to answer
A tribunal convicts individuals and leaves the structure intact
Evidence is gathered for a trial that may happen in fifteen years
Naming it triggers obligations, so it is not named
Diaspora warnings are dismissed as partisan
The threshold for the word 'genocide' is legal, not humanitarian
Lawyers advise against the word for exactly that reason
Troop-contributing countries veto the risk their soldiers may take
Survivors testify repeatedly and are helped by none of it