SPØRGSMÅLET
Why do atrocities go unpunished?
Brug dine klistermærker på det, der betyder mest. En idé med belæg kan få en reserveret plads.
lukket · tilbage til fasen Handlinger
Du ser med som gæst. Vælg et brugernavn for at komme med og deltage.
Dit budget af klistermærker
Én pr. idé, 5 i alt. Minimum er én stemme.
5 pladser er reserveret til oversete idéer — nominér én med et link, og den tæller, når 2 personer er enige om, at kilden er relevant.
hvorfor
Når fasen lukker, kommer én nomineret ind ved lodtrækning og resten efter antal nomineringer, højst én pr. interessentkategori. En model tjekker kun, om siden handler om samme emne — aldrig om den beviser påstanden. Den vurdering er rummets, og en nominering, som ingen andre bakker op, får ingen plads.
Justice arrives after the society that needed it has gone
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
Intet sagt endnu.
Nobody has ever costed prevention against the response that followed
stemmer: 0diskutér
Access requires the consent of the government doing the harming
stemmer: 0diskutér
Speaking publicly ends the access that lets us feed people
stemmer: 0diskutér
We compete with each other for the same appeal
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
stemmer: 0diskutér
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
stemmer: 0diskutér
Each summary removes the part that would require action
stemmer: 0diskutér
Field reports are summarised three times before they reach a capital
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
stemmer: 0diskutér
Peacekeepers are deployed with mandates that forbid what is needed
stemmer: 0diskutér
Justice arrives after the society that needed it has gone
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
Money arrives when there are bodies, not before
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
stemmer: 0diskutér
The warnings were unmistakable long before anything was done
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
stemmer: 0diskutér
The same states arming a party also vote on protecting its victims
stemmer: 0diskutér
A warning that is wrong destroys the credibility of the next one
stemmer: 0diskutér
Our funding depends on the emergency continuing
stemmer: 0diskutér
Local knowledge is treated as bias and distance is treated as objectivity
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
stemmer: 0diskutér
So the organisation that knows most says least
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
stemmer: 0diskutér
Local staff take the risk and international staff hold the mandate
stemmer: 0diskutér
So warnings are hedged until they are unarguable, which is too late
stemmer: 0diskutér
Arms sales and atrocity policy sit in different ministries
stemmer: 0diskutér
The people who see it first have no route to those who decide
stemmer: 0diskutér
A donor can point at a camp and cannot point at a war that did not start
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
stemmer: 0diskutér
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished
stemmer: 0diskutér
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted
stemmer: 0diskutér
Staff who witness it are bound by agreements they did not choose
stemmer: 0diskutér
Every state judges the case by what it costs them
stemmer: 0diskutér
A mission is judged on casualties among peacekeepers, not among civilians
stemmer: 0diskutér
Nobody is held accountable for a mission that watched
stemmer: 0diskutér
By the time it is a briefing it is a statistic
stemmer: 0diskutér
Early warning systems produce reports nobody is obliged to answer
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
stemmer: 0diskutér
A tribunal convicts individuals and leaves the structure intact
stemmer: 0diskutér
Evidence is gathered for a trial that may happen in fifteen years
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
stemmer: 0diskutér
Naming it triggers obligations, so it is not named
stemmer: 0diskutér
Diaspora warnings are dismissed as partisan
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
stemmer: 0diskutér
The threshold for the word 'genocide' is legal, not humanitarian
stemmer: 0diskutér
Lawyers advise against the word for exactly that reason
stemmer: 0diskutér
Troop-contributing countries veto the risk their soldiers may take
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
stemmer: 0diskutér
Survivors testify repeatedly and are helped by none of it
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
stemmer: 0diskutér