问题
Why do atrocities go unpunished?
把你的贴纸用在最重要的内容上。有证据支持的想法可以占用一个保留席位。
已关闭 · 返回行动阶段
正以访客身份查看。输入用户名即可加入并参与。
你的贴纸额度
每个想法最多一张，共 5 张。至少投一票。
有 5 个席位为被忽视的想法保留——附上链接提名一个，当 2 人认同来源相关时就会计入。
为什么
阶段结束时，一名被提名者通过随机抽签入选，其余按提名数入选，每个利益相关方类别最多一个。模型只检查页面是否关于同一主题——从不检查它是否证明了这个主张。那要由房间来判断；没有其他人支持的提名不能占用席位。
Nobody has ever costed prevention against the response that followed
0 票讨论
Access requires the consent of the government doing the harming
0 票讨论
Speaking publicly ends the access that lets us feed people
0 票讨论
We compete with each other for the same appeal
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
0 票讨论
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
0 票讨论
Each summary removes the part that would require action
0 票讨论
Field reports are summarised three times before they reach a capital
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
0 票讨论
Peacekeepers are deployed with mandates that forbid what is needed
0 票讨论
Justice arrives after the society that needed it has gone
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
0 票讨论
The warnings were unmistakable long before anything was done
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
0 票讨论
The same states arming a party also vote on protecting its victims
0 票讨论
A warning that is wrong destroys the credibility of the next one
0 票讨论
Our funding depends on the emergency continuing
0 票讨论
Local knowledge is treated as bias and distance is treated as objectivity
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
0 票讨论
So the organisation that knows most says least
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
0 票讨论
Local staff take the risk and international staff hold the mandate
0 票讨论
So warnings are hedged until they are unarguable, which is too late
0 票讨论
Arms sales and atrocity policy sit in different ministries
0 票讨论
A donor can point at a camp and cannot point at a war that did not start
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
0 票讨论
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished
0 票讨论
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted
0 票讨论
Staff who witness it are bound by agreements they did not choose
0 票讨论
Every state judges the case by what it costs them
0 票讨论
A mission is judged on casualties among peacekeepers, not among civilians
0 票讨论
Nobody is held accountable for a mission that watched
0 票讨论
By the time it is a briefing it is a statistic
0 票讨论
Early warning systems produce reports nobody is obliged to answer
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
0 票讨论
A tribunal convicts individuals and leaves the structure intact
0 票讨论
Evidence is gathered for a trial that may happen in fifteen years
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
0 票讨论
Naming it triggers obligations, so it is not named
0 票讨论
Diaspora warnings are dismissed as partisan
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
0 票讨论
The threshold for the word 'genocide' is legal, not humanitarian
0 票讨论
Lawyers advise against the word for exactly that reason
0 票讨论
Troop-contributing countries veto the risk their soldiers may take
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
0 票讨论
Survivors testify repeatedly and are helped by none of it
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
0 票讨论