PITANJE
Why do atrocities go unpunished?
Potrošite nalepnice na ono što je najvažnije. Ideja sa dokazom može da zauzme rezervisano mesto.
zatvoreno · nazad na fazu Akcije
Gledate kao gost. Unesite korisničko ime da biste se pridružili i učestvovali.
Vaš broj nalepnica
Jedna po ideji, ukupno 5. Najmanje jedan glas.
Rezervisana mesta za previđene ideje: 5 — nominujte jednu uz link, i ona se računa kada se dovoljno ljudi (2) složi da je izvor relevantan.
zašto
Kada se faza zatvori, jedan nominovani ulazi slučajnim izvlačenjem, a ostali po broju nominacija, najviše jedan po klasi zainteresovanih strana. Model proverava samo da li stranica govori o istoj temi — nikad da li dokazuje tvrdnju. Ta procena pripada sobi, a nominacija iza koje niko drugi ne stoji ne dobija mesto.
Survivors testify repeatedly and are helped by none of it
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
Još ništa nije rečeno.
Nobody has ever costed prevention against the response that followed
glasova: 0diskutuj
Access requires the consent of the government doing the harming
glasova: 0diskutuj
Speaking publicly ends the access that lets us feed people
glasova: 0diskutuj
We compete with each other for the same appeal
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
glasova: 0diskutuj
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
glasova: 0diskutuj
Each summary removes the part that would require action
glasova: 0diskutuj
Field reports are summarised three times before they reach a capital
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
glasova: 0diskutuj
Peacekeepers are deployed with mandates that forbid what is needed
glasova: 0diskutuj
Justice arrives after the society that needed it has gone
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
glasova: 0diskutuj
Money arrives when there are bodies, not before
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
glasova: 0diskutuj
The warnings were unmistakable long before anything was done
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
glasova: 0diskutuj
The same states arming a party also vote on protecting its victims
glasova: 0diskutuj
A warning that is wrong destroys the credibility of the next one
glasova: 0diskutuj
Our funding depends on the emergency continuing
glasova: 0diskutuj
Local knowledge is treated as bias and distance is treated as objectivity
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
glasova: 0diskutuj
So the organisation that knows most says least
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
glasova: 0diskutuj
Local staff take the risk and international staff hold the mandate
glasova: 0diskutuj
So warnings are hedged until they are unarguable, which is too late
glasova: 0diskutuj
Arms sales and atrocity policy sit in different ministries
glasova: 0diskutuj
The people who see it first have no route to those who decide
glasova: 0diskutuj
A donor can point at a camp and cannot point at a war that did not start
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
glasova: 0diskutuj
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished
glasova: 0diskutuj
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted
glasova: 0diskutuj
Staff who witness it are bound by agreements they did not choose
glasova: 0diskutuj
Every state judges the case by what it costs them
glasova: 0diskutuj
A mission is judged on casualties among peacekeepers, not among civilians
glasova: 0diskutuj
Nobody is held accountable for a mission that watched
glasova: 0diskutuj
By the time it is a briefing it is a statistic
glasova: 0diskutuj
Early warning systems produce reports nobody is obliged to answer
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
glasova: 0diskutuj
A tribunal convicts individuals and leaves the structure intact
glasova: 0diskutuj
Evidence is gathered for a trial that may happen in fifteen years
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
glasova: 0diskutuj
Naming it triggers obligations, so it is not named
glasova: 0diskutuj
Diaspora warnings are dismissed as partisan
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
glasova: 0diskutuj
The threshold for the word 'genocide' is legal, not humanitarian
glasova: 0diskutuj
Lawyers advise against the word for exactly that reason
glasova: 0diskutuj
Troop-contributing countries veto the risk their soldiers may take
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
glasova: 0diskutuj
Survivors testify repeatedly and are helped by none of it
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
glasova: 0u fokusu ↑ · zatvori ✕