True Causes
← lobby
Why is housing unaffordable here?
tap any completed stage to explore it
Generate
Clarify
Cluster
Select
Structure
Map
7
Actions
walkthrough · not counted
anyone with the link · listed publicly · federation on
30 people · 41 ideas · 2 groups · 3 rooms federated
Logic → · record
THE QUESTION

Why is housing unaffordable here?

Spend your stickers on what matters most. An idea with evidence can take a held seat.

closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
Your sticker budget
One per idea, 6 total. Floor is one vote.
5 places are held for overlooked ideas — nominate one with a link, and it counts once 2 people agree the source is relevant.
why
At stage close one nominee enters by random draw and the rest by nomination count, at most one per stakeholder class. A model checks only whether the page is about the same subject — never whether it proves the claim. That judgement is the room's, and a nomination nobody else stands behind takes no seat.
close ✕
The viability assessment is written by the developer
Nothing said yet.
CLUSTER 1
Nobody counts how many homes are actually empty
Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.
0 votesdiscuss
The city has no number for how many homes it needs
12 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 2
Social housing stock was sold and never replaced
Narrower than it reads; the wider version is someone else's card.
0 votesdiscuss
Councils cannot borrow to build at the scale needed
I mean this happens weekly, not once in a while.
6 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 3
Landlords price on what the market will bear, not on cost
I mean this happens weekly, not once in a while.
1 votesdiscuss
Materials and labour both cost what they did at peak
1 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 4
The word 'affordable' means eighty per cent of a price nobody can pay
Narrower than it reads; the wider version is someone else's card.
0 votesdiscuss
Nobody can afford to live where the work is
I mean this happens weekly, not once in a while.
14 votesdiscuss
NOT CLUSTERED
The last time this city built at scale it was after a war
2 votesdiscuss
A single objection can delay a scheme by two years
Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.
Housing benefit sets a floor under rents
Narrower than it reads; the wider version is someone else's card.
0 votesdiscuss
Renters move too often to vote here
6 votesdiscuss
Infrastructure is promised and arrives a decade late
Nobody in the planning office has ever built anything
1 votesdiscuss
Parking minimums use land that could be homes
0 votesdiscuss
Every scheme is judged on its own, never on the total
Observed, not measured — I would want the data too.
0 votesdiscuss
Every year of delay is a year of someone's life
2 votesdiscuss
Politicians are elected by owners, not by renters
Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.
12 votesdiscuss
Small builders cannot carry the cost of the permission process
I mean this happens weekly, not once in a while.
0 votesdiscuss
The green belt is a line drawn in 1955 and never re-examined
Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.
0 votes
↳ nominated for a seat: https://example.org/ops-incident-review.pdf could not read it (HTTPError) 1 of 2 behind it
discuss
We measure planning approvals, not homes completed
Narrower than it reads; the wider version is someone else's card.
0 votesdiscuss
Short lets pay more than a tenancy, so flats leave the market
1 votesdiscuss
Rents rise faster than wages every year
I mean this happens weekly, not once in a while.
15 votesdiscuss
The bus does not reach the land that is cheap
0 votesdiscuss
Skilled trades left during the last downturn and did not come back
Observed, not measured — I would want the data too.
1 votesdiscuss
Converting an office costs more than building new
Meaning the recurring case, not one incident.
7 votesdiscuss
Land is bought to hold, not to build on
1 votesdiscuss
The people worst affected are never in the room
To be precise: this is about the situation, not a person.
2 votesdiscuss
Homelessness services are funded, prevention is not
Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.
5 votesdiscuss
Building anything takes years of permissions
I mean this happens weekly, not once in a while.
15 votesdiscuss
The affordable quota is negotiated away after approval
7 votesdiscuss
Three firms build most of what gets built here
1 votesdiscuss
A four-year term is shorter than a building
0 votesdiscuss
Nobody is responsible for housing outcomes, only for process
Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.
3 votesdiscuss
A deposit now takes a decade to save
0 votesdiscuss
Nobody has costed what the housing crisis does to the health service
To be precise: this is about the situation, not a person.
3 votesdiscuss
Empty flats are worth more than let ones to some owners
14 votesdiscuss
The viability assessment is written by the developer
The people who object to building already own here
0 votesdiscuss
Offices sit empty while flats are unaffordable
3 votesdiscuss
Grant funding arrives in one-year cycles, so nothing long is planned
Observed, not measured — I would want the data too.
0 votesdiscuss