THE QUESTION
Why do affected communities rarely see the link between local pollution and their own health?
Does one significantly influence the other? Three quarters of the votes cast decide.
closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
Questions are shared out between groups, so you get the ones your group was given — not all 90.
18 / 90 settled 0 for you to answer 13 contested (parked, visible) why
Nobody could answer several hundred pairs. Each pair goes to one group; a pair that splits is then referred to other groups, so it can appear in your list later even though it started elsewhere. The settled count includes every group's work, which is why it climbs faster than your own list shrinks.
Last tally: 5 decided · 0 escalated to cross-group panels · 13 contested · 72 below quorum — panels need at least max(2, 75% of panel) votes cast; your smallest panel has 12 members.
The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. → influences? → Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety.
I’ve seen the factory’s discharge logs—sometimes the numbers on the report don’t match what’s visibly coming out of the pipe. If they’re only reporting averages, it could hide spikes that hurt my creek. That’s a direct link between the reporting rule and what’s actually happening.
moderator I've seen the permit forms that require average emissions reporting, and I know it doesn't reflect the actual daily emissions into the creek.
<y, a>
I have seen that the reporting requirement is for average emissions, not real‑time creek levels.
I have filled out forms requiring average emissions rather than actual creek flow
Averaged reporting is exactly the kind of data gap my own models rely on: compliance statistics can look clean while peak discharges run higher, which is precisely how permit adherence gets treated as proof of safety on paper.
I have seen the guys on the floor struggle to keep up with the paperwork, and I know that the numbers they report don't always match what's actually happening on the ground.
I have watched the average-emissions rule used to fill forms that do not match what actually pours into the creek. That is the mechanism behind the claim that permit adherence never proves safety.
I've seen how averaging numbers on forms hides what's actually happening, and that lets the company claim compliance while the creek gets polluted.
Completed phase — the record of pairs and votes stands above.Check the logic ↗
| The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | → | The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | ⚑ contested | discussing (8) |
| The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | → | Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | ⚑ contested | discussing (9) |
| The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | → | The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | ⚑ contested | discussing (9) |
| The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | → | The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | ⚑ contested | discussing (10) |
| The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | → | Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | ⚑ contested | discussing (10) |
| Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | → | The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | ⚑ contested | discussing (12) |
| Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | → | Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | ⚑ contested | discussing (12) |
| The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | → | Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | ⚑ contested | discussing (10) |
| The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | → | Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | ⚑ contested | in focus ↑ · close ✕ |
| The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | → | Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | ⚑ contested | discussing (8) |
| Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | → | Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | ⚑ contested | discussing (8) |
| The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | → | The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | ⚑ contested | discussing (12) |
| The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | → | Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | ⚑ contested | discussing (11) |
| Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | → | Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | open | discussing (9) |
| Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | → | The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | open | discussing (11) |
| Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | → | The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | open | discussing (10) |
| The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | → | Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | open | discussing (13) |
| Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | → | The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | open | discussing (8) |
| The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | → | The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | open | discussing (8) |
| Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | → | The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | open | discussing (8) |
| The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | → | Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | open | discussing (15) |
| Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | → | The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | open | discussing (11) |
| Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | → | The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | open | discussing (7) |
| Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | → | Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | open | discussing (10) |
| The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | → | The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | open | discussing (13) |
| Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | → | Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | open | discussing (13) |
| Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | → | Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | open | discussing (8) |
| The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | → | The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | open | discussing (10) |
| The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | → | Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | open | discussing (11) |
| Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | → | The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | open | discussing (10) |
| The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | → | Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | open | discussing (10) |
| The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | → | The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | open | discussing (12) |
| Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | → | The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | open | discussing (11) |
| The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | → | Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | open | discussing (10) |
| The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | → | The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | open | discussing (14) |
| Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | → | The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | open | discussing (12) |
| The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | → | The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | open | discussing (10) |
| The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | → | The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | open | discussing (12) |
| Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | → | Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | open | discussing (12) |
| Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | → | Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | open | discussing (8) |
| The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | → | The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | open | discussing (9) |
| The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | → | The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | open | discussing (10) |
| The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | → | The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | open | discussing (9) |
| The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | → | The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | open | discussing (10) |
| Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | → | Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | open | discussing (10) |
| Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | → | The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | open | discussing (7) |
| The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | → | Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | open | discussing (11) |
| The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | → | Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | open | discussing (9) |
| Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | → | The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | open | discussing (11) |
| The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | → | The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | open | discussing (13) |
| The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | → | Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | open | discussing (10) |
| Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | → | The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | open | discussing (9) |
| Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | → | The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | open | discussing (13) |
| Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | → | The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | open | discussing (10) |
| The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | → | Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | open | discussing (12) |
| The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | → | The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | open | discussing (8) |
| The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | → | Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | open | discussing (9) |
| The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | → | The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | open | discussing (9) |
| Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | → | The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | open | discussing (11) |
| The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | → | The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | open | discussing (10) |
| The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | → | Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | open | discussing (15) |
| Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | → | The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | open | discussing (10) |
| Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | → | The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | open | discussing (10) |
| Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | → | Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | open | discussing (9) |
| The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | → | The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | open | discussing (10) |
| Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | → | Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | open | discussing (9) |
| The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | → | The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | open | discussing (7) |
| The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | → | Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | open | discussing (9) |
| The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | → | The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | open | discussing (11) |
| The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | → | Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | open | discussing (10) |
| The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | → | The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | open | discussing (10) |
| Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | → | Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | open | discussing (11) |
| Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | → | The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | open | discussing (7) |
| The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | → | Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | open | discussing (9) |
| The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | → | Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | open | discussing (9) |
| The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | → | The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | open | discussing (13) |
| The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | → | Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | open | discussing (9) |
| Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | → | The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | open | discussing (9) |
| The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | → | The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | open | discussing (11) |
| The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | → | The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | open | discussing (12) |
| Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | → | The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | open | discussing (8) |
| Pollution's effects are often subtle and delayed, making it difficult for affected communities to connect local pollution to immediate health issues. | → | The rules say we must *wait* for the next inspection before we can even ask if the creek’s changing. | open | discussing (8) |
| The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | → | The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | open | discussing (8) |
| The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | → | The companies keep their reports vague and hide the worst releases, so we don't know what's hurting us. | open | discussing (10) |
| Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | → | The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | open | discussing (8) |
| The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | → | Health effects get averaged into regional statistics, so no community sees its own numbers. | ✓ yes | discussing (8) |
| The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | → | The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | ✓ yes | discussing (11) |
| The guys on the floor know but won't speak up, afraid of losing their jobs. | → | The rules say we have to report *average* emissions, not what’s actually pouring into that one creek every afternoon. | ✗ no | discussing (14) |
| The link is hidden in time and distance — health effects show up years later, far from any single plant. | → | Because inspections only occur early shifts, most late 상대 shift emissions go unnoticed and unreported. | ✗ no | discussing (6) |
| Permits legally separate emission limits from community health so compliance never proves safety. | → | The scrubber maintenance is scheduled when we're all tired and when residents aren't looking. | ✗ no | discussing (10) |