Strukturiranje · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

PITANJE

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Da li jedno značajno utiče na drugo? Odlučuju tri četvrtine datih glasova.

Gledate kao gost. Unesite korisničko ime da biste se pridružili i učestvovali.

Pitanja se raspodeljuju između grupa, pa dobijate ona koja su data vašoj grupi — ne svih 180.

zašto

Niko ne bi mogao da odgovori na nekoliko stotina parova. Svaki par ide jednoj grupi; par na kome se panel podeli zatim se upućuje drugim grupama, pa može kasnije da se pojavi na vašem spisku iako je počeo negde drugde. Broj rešenih uključuje rad svih grupa, zato raste brže nego što se vaš spisak smanjuje.

rešeno: 176 / 180 za vaš odgovor: 0

Poslednje prebrojavanje: rešeno: 176 · prosleđeno panelima više grupa: 0 · sporno: 0 · ispod kvoruma: 4 — panelima treba najmanje max(2, 75% panela) datih glasova; vaš najmanji panel ima 15 članova.

zatvori ✕

Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside → utiče na? → There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports

Još ništa nije rečeno.

Završena faza — zapis parova i glasova stoji iznad.Proveri logiku ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	otvoreno	diskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	otvoreno	diskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	otvoreno	diskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	otvoreno	diskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ da	diskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ da	diskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ da	diskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ da	diskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ da	diskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ da	diskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ da	diskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ da	diskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ da	diskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ da	diskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ da	diskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ da	diskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ da	diskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ da	diskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ da	diskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ da	diskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ da	diskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ da	diskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ da	diskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ da	diskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ da	diskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ izvedeno	diskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ ne	diskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ ne	diskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ ne	diskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ ne	diskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ ne	diskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ ne	diskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ ne	u fokusu ↑ · zatvori ✕
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ ne	diskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ ne	diskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ ne	diskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ ne	diskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ ne	diskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ ne	diskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ ne	diskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ ne	diskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ ne	diskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ ne	diskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ ne	diskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ ne	diskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ ne	diskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ ne	diskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ ne	diskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ ne	diskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ ne	diskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ ne	diskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ ne	diskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ ne	diskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ ne	diskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ ne	diskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ ne	diskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ ne	diskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ ne	diskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ ne	diskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ ne	diskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ ne	diskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ ne	diskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ ne	diskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ ne	diskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ ne	diskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ ne	diskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ ne	diskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ ne	diskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ ne	diskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ ne	diskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ ne	diskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ ne	diskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ ne	diskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ ne	diskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ ne	diskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ ne	diskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ ne	diskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ ne	diskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ ne	diskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ ne	diskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ ne	diskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ ne	diskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ ne	diskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ ne	diskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ ne	diskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ ne	diskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ ne	diskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ ne	diskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ ne	diskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ ne	diskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ ne	diskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ ne	diskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ ne	diskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ ne	diskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ ne	diskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ ne	diskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ ne	diskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ ne	diskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ ne	diskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ ne	diskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ ne	diskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ ne	diskutuj