True Causes
EN
← lobby
7/7 · Actions · viewing Cluster
30 people · 32 ideas
walkthrough · not counted
obstacles · anyone with the link · listed publicly · federation on
stewarded by its steward (sealed)
30 people · 32 ideas · 2 groups · 3 rooms federated
Passport → · Logic → · record
↗ share this map
On another site, as a live map:
As a picture: https://truecauses.org/d/55824a6/map.svg
As data: every judged pair in this room (CSV). Each claim has its own address, /c/55824a6/<card>, listed under the map.
Credit when you publish: Causal map: True Causes, https://truecauses.org/d/55824a6
THE QUESTION

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Group cards you judge alike. Groups organise reading; they decide nothing.

closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
Clusters form from similarity, names come last
Canonical order: link pairs of ideas you judge similar — links are symmetric (A~B is B~A; direction never matters) and a tie holds once 2 members make it.
why
Links are symmetric — A~B is B~A. Clusters are the groups that emerge from held ties, and only a formed cluster can be named, by a person. Your own links carry a ✕ to withdraw; you cannot remove someone else's. Clusters organise the wall and never gate the vote — two cards making the same CLAIM are a merge back in Clarify.
Links and names are made while Cluster is live; the steward’s ← reopens it.
close ✕
The team that would study long-term effects does not exist
Nothing said yet.
unnamed cluster — name it if the group has a common thread, or leave it unnamed (2)
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week
~ We cannot publish wha…We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it (18)
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (13)
discuss
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it
~ The people affected w…The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff (16)
~ An A/B test measures …An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week (18)
discuss
unnamed cluster — name it if the group has a common thread, or leave it unnamed (2)
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages
~ The rules are forty p…The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds (17)
discuss
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds
~ The rules are written…The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages (17)
discuss
unnamed cluster — name it if the group has a common thread, or leave it unnamed (2)
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre
~ Moderation is a cost …Moderation is a cost centre and ranking is a profit centre (16)
discuss
Moderation is a cost centre and ranking is a profit centre
~ A moderator sees the …A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre (16)
discuss
· not yet clustered (26)
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log
Nobody can explain why a particular post was shown
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (13)
~ Regulation asks for t…Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify (18)
discuss
Nobody is promoted for the feature they did not ship
An appeal is judged by the system that made the decision
A change that reduces engagement is reverted before anyone asks why
The founders were twenty-five and nobody senior said stop
Every external audit proposal dies in procurement
We built for a scale nobody had governed before
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (12)
discuss
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff
~ We cannot publish wha…We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it (16)
discuss
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (18)
~ Nobody can explain wh…Nobody can explain why a particular post was shown (18)
discuss
The team that would study long-term effects does not exist
Harm shows up in a quarter and the review cycle is six weeks
Researchers ask for data and legal says no
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside
The model is retrained weekly and nobody diffs its behaviour
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed
The people who raise concerns are moved to another team
The company would rather be regulated than be sued
People choose the sources that already agree with them
Automated removal is cheaper than being right
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make
~ We built for a scale …We built for a scale nobody had governed before (12)
~ An A/B test measures …An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week (13)
~ Regulation asks for t…Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify (18)
~ Nobody can explain wh…Nobody can explain why a particular post was shown (13)
discuss
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true