Struttura · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

LA DOMANDA

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Una influisce in modo significativo sull’altra? Decidono i tre quarti dei voti espressi.

Stai guardando come ospite. Inserisci un nome utente per entrare e partecipare.

Le domande sono distribuite tra i gruppi, quindi ricevi quelle assegnate al tuo gruppo — non tutte e 180.

perché

Nessuno potrebbe rispondere a diverse centinaia di coppie. Ogni coppia va a un gruppo; una coppia su cui il gruppo si divide passa poi ad altri gruppi, quindi può comparire più tardi nel tuo elenco anche se è partita altrove. Il numero delle risolte include il lavoro di tutti i gruppi, ed è per questo che sale più in fretta di quanto si accorci il tuo elenco.

risolte: 176 / 180 da rispondere: 0

Ultimo conteggio: decise: 176 · passate ai panel tra gruppi: 0 · contese: 0 · sotto il quorum: 4 — i panel richiedono almeno max(2, 75% del panel) voti espressi; il tuo panel più piccolo ha 15 membri.

chiudi ✕

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify → influisce su? → The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff

Ancora nessun intervento.

Fase conclusa — lo storico delle coppie e dei voti è qui sopra.Verifica la logica ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	aperta	discuti
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	aperta	discuti
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	aperta	discuti
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	aperta	discuti
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ sì	discuti
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ sì	discuti
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ sì	discuti
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ sì	discuti
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ sì	discuti
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ sì	discuti
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ sì	discuti
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ sì	discuti
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ sì	discuti
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ sì	discuti
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ sì	discuti
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ sì	discuti
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ sì	discuti
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ sì	discuti
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ sì	discuti
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ sì	discuti
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ sì	discuti
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ sì	in primo piano ↑ · chiudi ✕
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ sì	discuti
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ sì	discuti
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ sì	discuti
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ per deduzione	discuti
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discuti
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discuti
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discuti
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discuti
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discuti
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discuti
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discuti
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discuti
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discuti
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discuti
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discuti
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discuti
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discuti
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discuti
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discuti
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discuti
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discuti
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discuti
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discuti
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discuti
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discuti
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discuti
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discuti
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discuti
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discuti
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discuti
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discuti
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discuti
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discuti
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discuti
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discuti
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discuti
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discuti
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discuti
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discuti
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discuti
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discuti
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discuti
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discuti
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discuti
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discuti
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discuti
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discuti
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discuti
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discuti
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discuti
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discuti
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discuti
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discuti
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discuti
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discuti
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discuti
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discuti
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discuti
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discuti
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discuti
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discuti
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discuti
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discuti
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discuti
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discuti
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discuti
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discuti
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discuti
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discuti
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discuti
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discuti
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discuti
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discuti
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discuti
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discuti
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discuti
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discuti
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discuti
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discuti
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discuti
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discuti
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discuti
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discuti
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discuti
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discuti
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discuti
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discuti
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discuti
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discuti
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discuti
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discuti
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discuti
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discuti
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discuti
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discuti
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discuti
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discuti
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discuti
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discuti
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discuti
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discuti
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discuti
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discuti
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discuti
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discuti
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discuti
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discuti
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discuti
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discuti
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discuti
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discuti
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discuti
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discuti
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discuti
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discuti
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discuti
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discuti
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discuti
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discuti
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discuti
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discuti
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discuti
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discuti
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discuti
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discuti
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discuti
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discuti
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discuti
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discuti
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discuti
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discuti
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discuti
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discuti
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discuti
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discuti
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discuti
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discuti
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discuti
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discuti
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discuti
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discuti
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discuti
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discuti
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discuti
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discuti
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discuti
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discuti
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discuti
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discuti
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discuti
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discuti
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discuti
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discuti
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discuti
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discuti
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discuti
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discuti
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discuti