Estructuración · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

LA PREGUNTA

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

¿Influye una significativamente en la otra? Deciden tres cuartas partes de los votos emitidos.

Viendo como invitado. Escribe un nombre de usuario para unirte y participar.

Las preguntas se reparten entre los grupos, así que recibes las que le tocaron al tuyo — no las 180.

por qué

Nadie podría responder varios cientos de pares. Cada par va a un grupo; un par que se divide se deriva después a otros grupos, así que puede aparecer más tarde en tu lista aunque empezara en otro sitio. La cifra de resueltas incluye el trabajo de todos los grupos, y por eso sube más rápido de lo que se acorta tu propia lista.

resueltas: 176 / 180 por responder: 0

Último recuento: decididas: 176 · derivadas a paneles entre grupos: 0 · disputadas: 0 · sin quórum: 4 — los paneles necesitan al menos max(2, 75 % del panel) votos emitidos; tu panel más pequeño tiene 15 miembros.

cerrar ✕

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify → ¿influye en? → Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it

Nadie ha dicho nada aún.

Fase terminada — el registro de pares y votos queda arriba.Comprobar la lógica ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	abierto	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	abierto	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	abierto	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	abierto	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ sí	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ sí	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ sí	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ sí	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ sí	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ sí	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ sí	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ sí	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ sí	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ sí	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ sí	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ sí	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ sí	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ sí	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ sí	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ sí	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ sí	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ sí	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ sí	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ sí	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ sí	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ inferido	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ no	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ no	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ no	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ no	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ no	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ no	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ no	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ no	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ no	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ no	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	en foco ↑ · cerrar ✕
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ no	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ no	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ no	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ no	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ no	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ no	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ no	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ no	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ no	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ no	discutir