True Causes
ES
← vestíbulo
7/7 · Acciones · viendo Agrupación
personas: 30 · ideas: 32
demostración · no cuenta
obstáculos · cualquier persona con el enlace · listado públicamente · federación activada
coordinada por su coordinador (sellada)
personas: 30 · ideas: 32 · 2 grupos · 3 salas federada
Pasaporte → · Lógica → · registro
↗ compartir este mapa
En otro sitio, como mapa en vivo:
Como imagen: https://truecauses.org/d/55824a6/map.svg
Como datos: todos los pares juzgados en esta sala (CSV). Cada afirmación tiene su propia dirección, /c/55824a6/<card>, listada bajo el mapa.
Cita al publicar: Causal map: True Causes, https://truecauses.org/d/55824a6
LA PREGUNTA

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Agrupa las tarjetas que consideres parecidas. Los conjuntos ordenan la lectura; no deciden nada.

Viendo como invitado. Escribe un nombre de usuario para unirte y participar.
Los conjuntos se forman por parecido; los nombres vienen al final
Orden canónico: vincula pares de ideas que consideres parecidas — los vínculos son simétricos (A~B es B~A; la dirección nunca importa) y un vínculo se mantiene en cuanto lo hacen 2 miembros.
por qué
Los vínculos son simétricos — A~B es B~A. Los conjuntos son los grupos que surgen de los vínculos que se mantienen, y solo un conjunto ya formado puede recibir nombre, y lo pone una persona. Tus propios vínculos llevan una ✕ para retirarlos; no puedes quitar los de otra persona. Los conjuntos ordenan el muro y nunca condicionan la votación — dos tarjetas que hacen la misma AFIRMACIÓN se fusionan en la etapa Aclaración.
Los vínculos y los nombres se hacen mientras la etapa Agrupación está abierta; el botón ← del coordinador la reabre.
cerrar ✕
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify
Nadie ha dicho nada aún.
conjunto sin nombre — ponle nombre si el conjunto tiene un hilo común, o déjalo sin nombre (2)
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week
~ We cannot publish wha…We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it (18)
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (13)
discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it
~ The people affected w…The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff (16)
~ An A/B test measures …An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week (18)
discutir
conjunto sin nombre — ponle nombre si el conjunto tiene un hilo común, o déjalo sin nombre (2)
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages
~ The rules are forty p…The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds (17)
discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds
~ The rules are written…The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages (17)
discutir
conjunto sin nombre — ponle nombre si el conjunto tiene un hilo común, o déjalo sin nombre (2)
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre
~ Moderation is a cost …Moderation is a cost centre and ranking is a profit centre (16)
discutir
Moderation is a cost centre and ranking is a profit centre
~ A moderator sees the …A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre (16)
discutir
· aún sin conjunto (26)
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log
Nobody can explain why a particular post was shown
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (13)
~ Regulation asks for t…Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify (18)
discutir
Nobody is promoted for the feature they did not ship
An appeal is judged by the system that made the decision
A change that reduces engagement is reverted before anyone asks why
The founders were twenty-five and nobody senior said stop
Every external audit proposal dies in procurement
We built for a scale nobody had governed before
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (12)
discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff
~ We cannot publish wha…We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it (16)
discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (18)
~ Nobody can explain wh…Nobody can explain why a particular post was shown (18)
en foco ↑ · cerrar ✕
The team that would study long-term effects does not exist
Harm shows up in a quarter and the review cycle is six weeks
Researchers ask for data and legal says no
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside
The model is retrained weekly and nobody diffs its behaviour
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed
The people who raise concerns are moved to another team
The company would rather be regulated than be sued
People choose the sources that already agree with them
Automated removal is cheaper than being right
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make
~ We built for a scale …We built for a scale nobody had governed before (12)
~ An A/B test measures …An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week (13)
~ Regulation asks for t…Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify (18)
~ Nobody can explain wh…Nobody can explain why a particular post was shown (13)
discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true