Estruturação · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

A PERGUNTA

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Um influencia significativamente o outro? Decidem três quartos dos votos expressos.

A ver como convidado. Introduza um nome de utilizador para entrar e participar.

As perguntas são repartidas entre os grupos, por isso recebe as que foram dadas ao seu grupo — não todas as 180.

porquê

Ninguém conseguiria responder a várias centenas de pares. Cada par vai para um grupo; um par que se divide é depois enviado a outros grupos, por isso pode aparecer mais tarde na sua lista, mesmo tendo começado noutro lado. A contagem de decididos inclui o trabalho de todos os grupos, e é por isso que sobe mais depressa do que a sua própria lista encolhe.

decididos: 176 / 180 para responder: 0

Última contagem: decididos 176 · enviados a painéis entre grupos 0 · disputados 0 · abaixo do quórum 4 — os painéis precisam de pelo menos max(2, 75% do painel) votos expressos; o seu painel mais pequeno tem 15 membros.

fechar ✕

There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports → influencia? → Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside

Ainda nada foi dito.

Fase concluída — o registo de pares e votos mantém-se acima.Verificar a lógica ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	em aberto	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	em aberto	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	em aberto	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	em aberto	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ sim	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ sim	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ sim	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ sim	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ sim	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ sim	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ sim	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ sim	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ sim	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ sim	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ sim	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ sim	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ sim	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ sim	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ sim	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ sim	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ sim	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ sim	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ sim	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ sim	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ sim	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ inferido	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ não	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ não	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ não	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ não	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ não	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ não	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ não	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ não	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ não	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ não	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ não	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ não	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ não	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ não	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ não	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ não	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ não	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ não	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ não	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ não	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ não	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ não	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ não	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ não	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ não	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ não	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ não	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ não	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ não	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ não	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ não	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ não	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ não	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ não	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ não	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ não	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ não	em foco ↑ · fechar ✕
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ não	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ não	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ não	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ não	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ não	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ não	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ não	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ não	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ não	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ não	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ não	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ não	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ não	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ não	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ não	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ não	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ não	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ não	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ não	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ não	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ não	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ não	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ não	discutir
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ não	discutir
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ não	discutir
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ não	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ não	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ não	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ não	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ não	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ não	discutir
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ não	discutir
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ não	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ não	discutir
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ não	discutir
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ não	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ não	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ não	discutir
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ não	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ não	discutir
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ não	discutir
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ não	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ não	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ não	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ não	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ não	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ não	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ não	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ não	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ não	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ não	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ não	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ não	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ não	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ não	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ não	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ não	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ não	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ não	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ não	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ não	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ não	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ não	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ não	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ não	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ não	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ não	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ não	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ não	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ não	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ não	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ não	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ não	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ não	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ não	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ não	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ não	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ não	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ não	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ não	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ não	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ não	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ não	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ não	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ não	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ não	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ não	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ não	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ não	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ não	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ não	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ não	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ não	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ não	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ não	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ não	discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ não	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ não	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ não	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ não	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ não	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ não	discutir
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ não	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ não	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ não	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ não	discutir
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ não	discutir
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ não	discutir
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ não	discutir
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ não	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ não	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ não	discutir
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ não	discutir
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ não	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ não	discutir
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ não	discutir
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ não	discutir