Структурирање · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

ПИТАЊЕ

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Да ли једно значајно утиче на друго? Одлучују три четвртине датих гласова.

Гледате као гост. Унесите корисничко име да бисте се придружили и учествовали.

Питања се расподељују између група, па добијате она која су дата вашој групи — не свих 180.

зашто

Нико не би могао да одговори на неколико стотина парова. Сваки пар иде једној групи; пар на коме се панел подели затим се упућује другим групама, па може касније да се појави на вашем списку иако је почео негде другде. Број решених укључује рад свих група, зато расте брже него што се ваш списак смањује.

решено: 176 / 180 за ваш одговор: 0

Последње пребројавање: решено: 176 · прослеђено панелима више група: 0 · спорно: 0 · испод кворума: 4 — панелима треба најмање max(2, 75% панела) датих гласова; ваш најмањи панел има 15 чланова.

затвори ✕

There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports → утиче на? → The metric was chosen because it was easy to log

Још ништа није речено.

Завршена фаза — запис парова и гласова стоји изнад.Провери логику ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	отворено	дискутуј
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	отворено	дискутуј
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	отворено	дискутуј
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	отворено	дискутуј
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ да	дискутуј
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ да	дискутуј
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ да	дискутуј
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ да	дискутуј
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ да	дискутуј
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ да	дискутуј
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ да	дискутуј
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ да	дискутуј
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ да	дискутуј
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ да	дискутуј
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ да	дискутуј
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ да	дискутуј
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ да	дискутуј
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ да	дискутуј
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ да	дискутуј
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ да	дискутуј
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ да	дискутуј
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ да	дискутуј
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ да	дискутуј
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ да	дискутуј
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ да	дискутуј
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ изведено	дискутуј
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ не	дискутуј
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ не	дискутуј
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ не	дискутуј
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ не	дискутуј
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ не	дискутуј
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ не	дискутуј
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ не	дискутуј
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ не	дискутуј
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ не	дискутуј
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ не	у фокусу ↑ · затвори ✕
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ не	дискутуј
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ не	дискутуј
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ не	дискутуј
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ не	дискутуј
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ не	дискутуј
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ не	дискутуј
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ не	дискутуј
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ не	дискутуј
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ не	дискутуј
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ не	дискутуј
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ не	дискутуј
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ не	дискутуј
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ не	дискутуј
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ не	дискутуј
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ не	дискутуј
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ не	дискутуј
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ не	дискутуј
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ не	дискутуј
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ не	дискутуј
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ не	дискутуј
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ не	дискутуј
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ не	дискутуј
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ не	дискутуј
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ не	дискутуј
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ не	дискутуј
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ не	дискутуј
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ не	дискутуј
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ не	дискутуј
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ не	дискутуј
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ не	дискутуј
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ не	дискутуј
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ не	дискутуј
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ не	дискутуј
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ не	дискутуј
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ не	дискутуј
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ не	дискутуј
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ не	дискутуј
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ не	дискутуј
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ не	дискутуј
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ не	дискутуј
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ не	дискутуј
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ не	дискутуј
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ не	дискутуј
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ не	дискутуј
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ не	дискутуј
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ не	дискутуј
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ не	дискутуј
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ не	дискутуј
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ не	дискутуј
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ не	дискутуј
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ не	дискутуј
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ не	дискутуј
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ не	дискутуј
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ не	дискутуј
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ не	дискутуј
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ не	дискутуј
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ не	дискутуј
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ не	дискутуј
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ не	дискутуј
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ не	дискутуј
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ не	дискутуј
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ не	дискутуј
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ не	дискутуј
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ не	дискутуј
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ не	дискутуј
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ не	дискутуј
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ не	дискутуј
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ не	дискутуј
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ не	дискутуј
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ не	дискутуј
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ не	дискутуј
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ не	дискутуј
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ не	дискутуј
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ не	дискутуј
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ не	дискутуј
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ не	дискутуј
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ не	дискутуј
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ не	дискутуј
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ не	дискутуј
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ не	дискутуј
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ не	дискутуј
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ не	дискутуј
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ не	дискутуј
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ не	дискутуј
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ не	дискутуј
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ не	дискутуј
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ не	дискутуј
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ не	дискутуј
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ не	дискутуј
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ не	дискутуј
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ не	дискутуј
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ не	дискутуј
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ не	дискутуј
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ не	дискутуј
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ не	дискутуј
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ не	дискутуј
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ не	дискутуј
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ не	дискутуј
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ не	дискутуј
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ не	дискутуј
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ не	дискутуј
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ не	дискутуј
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ не	дискутуј
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ не	дискутуј
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ не	дискутуј
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ не	дискутуј
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ не	дискутуј
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ не	дискутуј
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ не	дискутуј
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ не	дискутуј
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ не	дискутуј
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ не	дискутуј
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ не	дискутуј
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ не	дискутуј
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ не	дискутуј
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ не	дискутуј