Cấu trúc · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

CÂU HỎI

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Liệu cái này có ảnh hưởng đáng kể đến cái kia không? Ba phần tư số phiếu đã bỏ sẽ quyết định.

Đang xem với tư cách khách. Nhập tên người dùng để vào và tham gia.

Các câu hỏi được chia cho các nhóm, nên bạn nhận những câu được giao cho nhóm mình — không phải cả 180 câu.

vì sao

Không ai trả lời nổi vài trăm cặp thẻ. Mỗi cặp được giao cho một nhóm; cặp nào bị chia rẽ sẽ được chuyển sang các nhóm khác, nên nó có thể xuất hiện trong danh sách của bạn sau này dù bắt đầu ở nơi khác. Số đã ngã ngũ tính cả công việc của mọi nhóm, vì vậy nó tăng nhanh hơn tốc độ danh sách của bạn ngắn lại.

176 / 180 đã ngã ngũ 0 câu chờ bạn trả lời

Lần kiểm phiếu gần nhất: 176 đã quyết · 0 chuyển lên hội đồng liên nhóm · 0 còn tranh cãi · 4 chưa đủ số người tối thiểu — hội đồng cần ít nhất max(2, 75% hội đồng) phiếu đã bỏ; hội đồng nhỏ nhất của bạn có 15 thành viên.

đóng ✕

There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports → ảnh hưởng? → Automated removal is cheaper than being right

Chưa ai nói gì.

Giai đoạn đã xong — hồ sơ các cặp thẻ và phiếu bầu nằm ở trên.Kiểm tra lập luận ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	đang mở	thảo luận
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	đang mở	thảo luận
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	đang mở	thảo luận
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	đang mở	thảo luận
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ có	thảo luận
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ có	thảo luận
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ có	thảo luận
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ có	thảo luận
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ có	đang mở ↑ · đóng ✕
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ có	thảo luận
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ có	thảo luận
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ có	thảo luận
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ có	thảo luận
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ có	thảo luận
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ có	thảo luận
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ có	thảo luận
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ có	thảo luận
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ có	thảo luận
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ có	thảo luận
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ có	thảo luận
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ có	thảo luận
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ có	thảo luận
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ có	thảo luận
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ có	thảo luận
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ có	thảo luận
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ suy ra	thảo luận
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ không	thảo luận
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ không	thảo luận
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ không	thảo luận
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ không	thảo luận
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ không	thảo luận
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ không	thảo luận
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ không	thảo luận
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ không	thảo luận
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ không	thảo luận
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ không	thảo luận
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ không	thảo luận
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ không	thảo luận
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ không	thảo luận
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ không	thảo luận
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ không	thảo luận
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ không	thảo luận
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ không	thảo luận
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ không	thảo luận
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ không	thảo luận
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ không	thảo luận
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ không	thảo luận
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ không	thảo luận
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ không	thảo luận
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ không	thảo luận
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ không	thảo luận
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ không	thảo luận
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ không	thảo luận
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ không	thảo luận
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ không	thảo luận
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ không	thảo luận
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ không	thảo luận
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ không	thảo luận
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ không	thảo luận
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ không	thảo luận
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ không	thảo luận
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ không	thảo luận
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ không	thảo luận
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ không	thảo luận
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ không	thảo luận
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ không	thảo luận
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ không	thảo luận
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ không	thảo luận
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ không	thảo luận
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ không	thảo luận
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ không	thảo luận
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ không	thảo luận
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ không	thảo luận
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ không	thảo luận
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ không	thảo luận
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ không	thảo luận
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ không	thảo luận
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ không	thảo luận
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ không	thảo luận
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ không	thảo luận
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ không	thảo luận
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ không	thảo luận
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ không	thảo luận
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ không	thảo luận
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ không	thảo luận
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ không	thảo luận
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ không	thảo luận
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ không	thảo luận
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ không	thảo luận
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ không	thảo luận
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ không	thảo luận
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ không	thảo luận
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ không	thảo luận
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ không	thảo luận
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ không	thảo luận
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ không	thảo luận
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ không	thảo luận
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ không	thảo luận
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ không	thảo luận
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ không	thảo luận
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ không	thảo luận
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ không	thảo luận
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ không	thảo luận
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ không	thảo luận
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ không	thảo luận
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ không	thảo luận
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ không	thảo luận
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ không	thảo luận
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ không	thảo luận
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ không	thảo luận
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ không	thảo luận
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ không	thảo luận
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ không	thảo luận
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ không	thảo luận
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ không	thảo luận
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ không	thảo luận
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ không	thảo luận
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ không	thảo luận
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ không	thảo luận
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ không	thảo luận
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ không	thảo luận
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ không	thảo luận
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ không	thảo luận
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ không	thảo luận
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ không	thảo luận
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ không	thảo luận
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ không	thảo luận
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ không	thảo luận
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ không	thảo luận
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ không	thảo luận
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ không	thảo luận
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ không	thảo luận
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ không	thảo luận
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ không	thảo luận