Strukturering · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

SPØRSMÅLET

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Påvirker det ene det andre i betydelig grad? Tre firedeler av de avgitte stemmene avgjør.

Du ser på som gjest. Skriv inn et brukernavn for å bli med og delta.

Spørsmålene fordeles mellom gruppene, så du får dem gruppen din ble tildelt — ikke alle 180.

hvorfor

Ingen kunne svart på flere hundre par. Hvert par går til én gruppe; et par som deler gruppen, sendes så videre til andre grupper, så det kan dukke opp i listen din senere selv om det startet et annet sted. Antallet avgjorte omfatter alle gruppenes arbeid, og derfor stiger det raskere enn din egen liste krymper.

avgjort: 176 / 180 til deg å svare på: 0

Siste opptelling: avgjort 176 · sendt videre til paneler på tvers av grupper 0 · omstridt 0 · under kvorum 4 — paneler trenger minst max(2, 75% av panelet) avgitte stemmer; ditt minste panel har 15 medlemmer.

lukk ✕

Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed → påvirker? → The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds

Ingenting sagt ennå.

Fullført fase — protokollen over par og stemmer står ovenfor.Sjekk logikken ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	åpent	diskuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	åpent	diskuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	åpent	diskuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	åpent	diskuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ ja	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ ja	diskuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ ja	diskuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ ja	diskuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ ja	diskuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ ja	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ ja	diskuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ ja	diskuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ ja	diskuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ ja	diskuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ ja	diskuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ ja	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ ja	diskuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ ja	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ ja	diskuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ ja	diskuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ ja	diskuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ ja	diskuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ ja	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ ja	diskuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ ja	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ utledet	i fokus ↑ · lukk ✕
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nei	diskuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nei	diskuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nei	diskuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nei	diskuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nei	diskuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nei	diskuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nei	diskuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nei	diskuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nei	diskuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nei	diskuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nei	diskuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nei	diskuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nei	diskuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nei	diskuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nei	diskuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nei	diskuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nei	diskuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nei	diskuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nei	diskuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nei	diskuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nei	diskuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nei	diskuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nei	diskuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nei	diskuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nei	diskuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nei	diskuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nei	diskuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nei	diskuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nei	diskuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nei	diskuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nei	diskuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nei	diskuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nei	diskuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nei	diskuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nei	diskuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nei	diskuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nei	diskuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nei	diskuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nei	diskuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nei	diskuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nei	diskuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nei	diskuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nei	diskuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nei	diskuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nei	diskuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nei	diskuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nei	diskuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nei	diskuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nei	diskuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nei	diskuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nei	diskuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nei	diskuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nei	diskuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nei	diskuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nei	diskuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nei	diskuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nei	diskuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nei	diskuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nei	diskuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nei	diskuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nei	diskuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nei	diskuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nei	diskuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nei	diskuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nei	diskuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nei	diskuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nei	diskuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nei	diskuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nei	diskuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nei	diskuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nei	diskuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nei	diskuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nei	diskuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nei	diskuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nei	diskuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nei	diskuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nei	diskuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nei	diskuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nei	diskuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nei	diskuter