Strukturieren · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

DIE FRAGE

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Beeinflusst das eine das andere maßgeblich? Es entscheiden drei Viertel der abgegebenen Stimmen.

Ansicht als Gast. Benutzernamen eingeben, um beizutreten und mitzumachen.

Die Fragen werden auf die Gruppen verteilt, daher bekommen Sie die, die Ihre Gruppe erhalten hat — nicht alle 180.

warum

Niemand könnte mehrere hundert Paare beantworten. Jedes Paar geht an eine Gruppe; ist sie uneinig, wird das Paar an andere Gruppen weitergegeben, daher kann es später in Ihrer Liste auftauchen, obwohl es woanders begonnen hat. Die Zahl der entschiedenen Fragen enthält die Arbeit aller Gruppen, deshalb steigt sie schneller, als Ihre eigene Liste schrumpft.

176 / 180 entschieden 0 für Sie zu beantworten

Letzte Auszählung: 176 entschieden · 0 an gruppenübergreifende Panels weitergegeben · 0 umstritten · 4 unter dem Quorum — Panels brauchen mindestens max(2, 75 % des Panels) abgegebene Stimmen; Ihr kleinstes Panel hat 15 Mitglieder.

schließen ✕

We built for a scale nobody had governed before → beeinflusst? → The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff

Noch nichts gesagt.

Abgeschlossene Phase — das Protokoll der Paare und Stimmen steht oben.Logik prüfen ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	offen	diskutieren
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	offen	diskutieren
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	offen	diskutieren
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	offen	diskutieren
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ ja	diskutieren
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ ja	diskutieren
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ ja	diskutieren
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ ja	diskutieren
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ ja	diskutieren
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ ja	diskutieren
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ ja	diskutieren
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ ja	diskutieren
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ ja	diskutieren
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ ja	diskutieren
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ ja	diskutieren
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ ja	diskutieren
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ ja	diskutieren
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ ja	diskutieren
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ ja	diskutieren
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ ja	diskutieren
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ ja	diskutieren
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ ja	diskutieren
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ ja	diskutieren
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ ja	diskutieren
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ ja	diskutieren
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ abgeleitet	diskutieren
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nein	diskutieren
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nein	diskutieren
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nein	diskutieren
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nein	diskutieren
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nein	diskutieren
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nein	diskutieren
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nein	diskutieren
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nein	diskutieren
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nein	diskutieren
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nein	diskutieren
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nein	diskutieren
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nein	diskutieren
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nein	diskutieren
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nein	diskutieren
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nein	diskutieren
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nein	diskutieren
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nein	diskutieren
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nein	diskutieren
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nein	diskutieren
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nein	diskutieren
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nein	diskutieren
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nein	diskutieren
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nein	diskutieren
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nein	diskutieren
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nein	diskutieren
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nein	diskutieren
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nein	diskutieren
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nein	diskutieren
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nein	diskutieren
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nein	diskutieren
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nein	diskutieren
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nein	diskutieren
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nein	diskutieren
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nein	diskutieren
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nein	diskutieren
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nein	diskutieren
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nein	diskutieren
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nein	diskutieren
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nein	diskutieren
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nein	diskutieren
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nein	diskutieren
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nein	diskutieren
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nein	diskutieren
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nein	diskutieren
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nein	diskutieren
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nein	diskutieren
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nein	diskutieren
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nein	diskutieren
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nein	diskutieren
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nein	diskutieren
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nein	diskutieren
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nein	diskutieren
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nein	diskutieren
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nein	diskutieren
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nein	diskutieren
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nein	diskutieren
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nein	diskutieren
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nein	diskutieren
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nein	diskutieren
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nein	diskutieren
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nein	diskutieren
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nein	diskutieren
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nein	diskutieren
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nein	diskutieren
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nein	diskutieren
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nein	diskutieren
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nein	diskutieren
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nein	diskutieren
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nein	diskutieren
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nein	diskutieren
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nein	diskutieren
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nein	diskutieren
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nein	diskutieren
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nein	diskutieren
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nein	diskutieren
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nein	diskutieren
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nein	diskutieren
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nein	diskutieren
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nein	diskutieren
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nein	diskutieren
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nein	diskutieren
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nein	diskutieren
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nein	diskutieren
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nein	diskutieren
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nein	diskutieren
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nein	diskutieren
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nein	diskutieren
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nein	diskutieren
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nein	diskutieren
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nein	diskutieren
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nein	diskutieren
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nein	diskutieren
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nein	diskutieren
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nein	diskutieren
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nein	diskutieren
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nein	diskutieren
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nein	diskutieren
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nein	diskutieren
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nein	diskutieren
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nein	diskutieren
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nein	diskutieren
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nein	diskutieren
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nein	diskutieren
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nein	diskutieren
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nein	diskutieren
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nein	diskutieren
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nein	diskutieren
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nein	diskutieren
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nein	diskutieren
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nein	diskutieren
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nein	im Fokus ↑ · schließen ✕
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nein	diskutieren
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nein	diskutieren