True Causes
EL
← αρχική
7/7 · Δράσεις · προβολή: Δόμηση
άτομα: 30 · ιδέες: 32
πατήστε ένα ολοκληρωμένο στάδιο για να το εξερευνήσετε
✓
Καταγραφή
✓
Διευκρίνιση
✓
Ομαδοποίηση
✓
Επιλογή
✓
Δόμηση
✓
Χάρτης
7
Δράσεις
επίδειξη · δεν μετράει
εμπόδια · όποιος έχει τον σύνδεσμο · δημόσια καταχωρισμένη · σε ομοσπονδία
οικοδεσπότης: ο οικοδεσπότης της (σφραγισμένη)
άτομα: 30 · ιδέες: 32 · 2 ομάδες · 3 αίθουσες σε ομοσπονδία
Διαβατήριο → · Λογική → · αρχείο
↗ κοινοποίηση αυτού του χάρτη
Σε άλλον ιστότοπο, ως ζωντανός χάρτης:
Ως εικόνα: https://truecauses.org/d/55824a6/map.svg
Ως δεδομένα: κάθε ζεύγος που κρίθηκε σε αυτή την αίθουσα (CSV). Κάθε ισχυρισμός έχει τη δική του διεύθυνση, /c/55824a6/<card>, που αναγράφεται κάτω από τον χάρτη.
Αναφορά προέλευσης όταν δημοσιεύετε: Causal map: True Causes, https://truecauses.org/d/55824a6
ΤΟ ΕΡΩΤΗΜΑ

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Επηρεάζει σημαντικά το ένα το άλλο; Αποφασίζουν τα τρία τέταρτα των ψήφων που δόθηκαν.

Προβολή ως επισκέπτης. Δώστε ένα όνομα χρήστη για να μπείτε και να συμμετάσχετε.
Τα ερωτήματα μοιράζονται ανάμεσα στις ομάδες, οπότε παίρνετε όσα δόθηκαν στην ομάδα σας — όχι και τα 180.
γιατί
Κανείς δεν θα μπορούσε να απαντήσει σε εκατοντάδες ζεύγη. Κάθε ζεύγος πηγαίνει σε μία ομάδα· ένα ζεύγος που διχάζει παραπέμπεται μετά σε άλλες ομάδες, οπότε μπορεί να εμφανιστεί αργότερα στη λίστα σας, παρόλο που ξεκίνησε αλλού. Ο αριθμός των κριμένων περιλαμβάνει τη δουλειά κάθε ομάδας, γι’ αυτό ανεβαίνει πιο γρήγορα απ’ ό,τι μικραίνει η δική σας λίστα.
κρίθηκαν 176 / 180 για να απαντήσετε: 0
Τελευταία καταμέτρηση: κρίθηκαν 176 · παραπέμφθηκαν σε διομαδικά πάνελ 0 · αμφισβητούμενα 0 · κάτω από την απαρτία 4 — τα πάνελ χρειάζονται τουλάχιστον max(2, 75% του πάνελ) ψήφους· το μικρότερο πάνελ σας έχει 15 μέλη.
κλείσιμο ✕
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest → επηρεάζει; → People choose the sources that already agree with them
Δεν ειπώθηκε τίποτα ακόμη.
Ολοκληρωμένη φάση — η καταγραφή ζευγών και ψήφων βρίσκεται παραπάνω.Ελέγξτε τη λογική ↗
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify→Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we makeανοιχτόσυζήτηση
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true→The people affected worst are in markets we do not staffανοιχτόσυζήτηση
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff→Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verifyανοιχτόσυζήτηση
We built for a scale nobody had governed before→An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a weekανοιχτόσυζήτηση
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds→Automated removal is cheaper than being right✓ ναισυζήτηση
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed→Researchers ask for data and legal says no✓ ναισυζήτηση
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages→There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports✓ ναισυζήτηση
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log→Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed✓ ναισυζήτηση
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports→Automated removal is cheaper than being right✓ ναισυζήτηση
Researchers ask for data and legal says no→The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages✓ ναισυζήτηση
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed→A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre✓ ναισυζήτηση
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds→Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside✓ ναισυζήτηση
Researchers ask for data and legal says no→Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside✓ ναισυζήτηση
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre→The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds✓ ναισυζήτηση
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make→Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true✓ ναισυζήτηση
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify→People choose the sources that already agree with them✓ ναισυζήτηση
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it→We built for a scale nobody had governed before✓ ναισυζήτηση
We built for a scale nobody had governed before→Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true✓ ναισυζήτηση
People choose the sources that already agree with them→Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest✓ ναισυζήτηση
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true→Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it✓ ναισυζήτηση
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest→Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it✓ ναισυζήτηση
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify→The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff✓ ναισυζήτηση
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest→The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff✓ ναισυζήτηση
People choose the sources that already agree with them→We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it✓ ναισυζήτηση
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest→We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it✓ ναισυζήτηση
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed→The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds✓ συναγόμενοσυζήτηση
Automated removal is cheaper than being right→A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre✗ όχισυζήτηση
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log→A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre✗ όχισυζήτηση
Researchers ask for data and legal says no→Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed✗ όχισυζήτηση
Researchers ask for data and legal says no→There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports✗ όχισυζήτηση
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside→The metric was chosen because it was easy to log✗ όχισυζήτηση
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount→Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed✗ όχισυζήτηση
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount→The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds✗ όχισυζήτηση
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount→A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre✗ όχισυζήτηση
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount→There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports✗ όχισυζήτηση
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports→The metric was chosen because it was easy to log✗ όχισυζήτηση
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside→There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports✗ όχισυζήτηση
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre→Researchers ask for data and legal says no✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds→The metric was chosen because it was easy to log✗ όχισυζήτηση
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre→Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside✗ όχισυζήτηση
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount→The metric was chosen because it was easy to log✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds→Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages→Automated removal is cheaper than being right✗ όχισυζήτηση
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside→Automated removal is cheaper than being right✗ όχισυζήτηση
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount→The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages→Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside✗ όχισυζήτηση
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside→Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed→There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports✗ όχισυζήτηση
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log→There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages→Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount✗ όχισυζήτηση
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports→A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed→The metric was chosen because it was easy to log✗ όχισυζήτηση
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre→The metric was chosen because it was easy to log✗ όχισυζήτηση
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside→A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre✗ όχισυζήτηση
Researchers ask for data and legal says no→Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount✗ όχισυζήτηση
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside→The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages✗ όχισυζήτηση
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log→The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages✗ όχισυζήτηση
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports→The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages✗ όχισυζήτηση
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log→Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds→The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages✗ όχισυζήτηση
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside→Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed✗ όχισυζήτηση
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount→Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside✗ όχισυζήτηση
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports→Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside✗ όχισυζήτηση
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside→Researchers ask for data and legal says no✗ όχισυζήτηση
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log→The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages→A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed→Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside✗ όχισυζήτηση
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre→Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount✗ όχισυζήτηση
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre→Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed✗ όχισυζήτηση
Researchers ask for data and legal says no→The metric was chosen because it was easy to log✗ όχισυζήτηση
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports→Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed✗ όχισυζήτηση
Automated removal is cheaper than being right→There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports✗ όχισυζήτηση
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log→Researchers ask for data and legal says no✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed→Automated removal is cheaper than being right✗ όχισυζήτηση
Automated removal is cheaper than being right→The metric was chosen because it was easy to log✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages→The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages→The metric was chosen because it was easy to log✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds→Researchers ask for data and legal says no✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages→Researchers ask for data and legal says no✗ όχισυζήτηση
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports→Researchers ask for data and legal says no✗ όχισυζήτηση
Automated removal is cheaper than being right→The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages✗ όχισυζήτηση
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre→Automated removal is cheaper than being right✗ όχισυζήτηση
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre→There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports✗ όχισυζήτηση
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount→Automated removal is cheaper than being right✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed→Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds→Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages→Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed✗ όχισυζήτηση
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside→The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed→The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages✗ όχισυζήτηση
Automated removal is cheaper than being right→Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside✗ όχισυζήτηση
Automated removal is cheaper than being right→The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds✗ όχισυζήτηση
Automated removal is cheaper than being right→Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed✗ όχισυζήτηση
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports→Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount✗ όχισυζήτηση
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log→Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount✗ όχισυζήτηση
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports→The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds✗ όχισυζήτηση
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre→The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages✗ όχισυζήτηση
Researchers ask for data and legal says no→The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds✗ όχισυζήτηση
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount→Researchers ask for data and legal says no✗ όχισυζήτηση
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log→Automated removal is cheaper than being right✗ όχισυζήτηση
Automated removal is cheaper than being right→Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds→There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports✗ όχισυζήτηση
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds→A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre✗ όχισυζήτηση
Researchers ask for data and legal says no→A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre✗ όχισυζήτηση
Researchers ask for data and legal says no→Automated removal is cheaper than being right✗ όχισυζήτηση
Automated removal is cheaper than being right→Researchers ask for data and legal says no✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make→We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make→Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify✗ όχισυζήτηση
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff→Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true✗ όχισυζήτηση
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff→Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest✗ όχισυζήτηση
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest→Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make→Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it→The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it→People choose the sources that already agree with them✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true→People choose the sources that already agree with them✗ όχισυζήτηση
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week→Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make✗ όχισυζήτηση
People choose the sources that already agree with them→Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make✗ όχισυζήτηση
We built for a scale nobody had governed before→Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it✗ όχισυζήτηση
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest→Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify✗ όχισυζήτηση
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify→Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true→Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify✗ όχισυζήτηση
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest→We built for a scale nobody had governed before✗ όχισυζήτηση
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it→People choose the sources that already agree with them✗ όχισυζήτηση
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff→People choose the sources that already agree with them✗ όχισυζήτηση
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it→An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week✗ όχισυζήτηση
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify→Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true✗ όχισυζήτηση
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week→People choose the sources that already agree with them✗ όχισυζήτηση
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week→The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff✗ όχισυζήτηση
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it→The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff✗ όχισυζήτηση
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week→Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify✗ όχισυζήτηση
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify→Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest✗ όχισυζήτηση
People choose the sources that already agree with them→Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true✗ όχισυζήτηση
We built for a scale nobody had governed before→Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make✗ όχισυζήτηση
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week→Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it→Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest✗ όχισυζήτηση
People choose the sources that already agree with them→Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true→Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make→The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it→Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it→We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make→People choose the sources that already agree with them✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it→An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week✗ όχισυζήτηση
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff→We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it✗ όχισυζήτηση
People choose the sources that already agree with them→Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true→An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week✗ όχισυζήτηση
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week→We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it✗ όχισυζήτηση
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest→An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week✗ όχισυζήτηση
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it→Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make→We built for a scale nobody had governed before✗ όχισυζήτηση
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest→Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true✗ όχισυζήτηση
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it→Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest✗ όχισυζήτηση
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it→Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it✗ όχισυζήτηση
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify→We built for a scale nobody had governed before✗ όχισυζήτηση
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week→Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true✗ όχισυζήτηση
We built for a scale nobody had governed before→We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it✗ όχισυζήτηση
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify→We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true→Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make→An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week✗ όχισυζήτηση
We built for a scale nobody had governed before→People choose the sources that already agree with them✗ όχισυζήτηση
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff→We built for a scale nobody had governed before✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make→Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it✗ όχισυζήτηση
People choose the sources that already agree with them→We built for a scale nobody had governed before✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it→Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify✗ όχισυζήτηση
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff→Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it✗ όχισυζήτηση
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it→Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify✗ όχισυζήτηση
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week→Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it✗ όχισυζήτηση
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest→People choose the sources that already agree with them✗ όχισε εστίαση ↑ · κλείσιμο ✕
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true→We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it✗ όχισυζήτηση
People choose the sources that already agree with them→An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week✗ όχισυζήτηση
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff→Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make✗ όχισυζήτηση
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true→We built for a scale nobody had governed before✗ όχισυζήτηση
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify→An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week✗ όχισυζήτηση
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff→An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week✗ όχισυζήτηση
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it→Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make✗ όχισυζήτηση
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it→Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make✗ όχισυζήτηση
We built for a scale nobody had governed before→Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify✗ όχισυζήτηση
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it→We built for a scale nobody had governed before✗ όχισυζήτηση
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week→We built for a scale nobody had governed before✗ όχισυζήτηση
We built for a scale nobody had governed before→The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff✗ όχισυζήτηση
We built for a scale nobody had governed before→Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest✗ όχισυζήτηση
People choose the sources that already agree with them→The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff✗ όχισυζήτηση