Struktura · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

PYTANIE

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Czy jedno istotnie wpływa na drugie? Decydują trzy czwarte oddanych głosów.

Podgląd jako gość. Podaj nazwę użytkownika, żeby dołączyć i wziąć udział.

Pytania są rozdzielane między grupy, więc dostajesz te, które przypadły Twojej grupie — nie wszystkie (łącznie: 180).

dlaczego

Nikt nie odpowie na kilkaset par. Każda para trafia do jednej grupy; para, przy której zdania się podzieliły, jest potem kierowana do innych grup, więc może pojawić się później na Twojej liście, choć zaczęła gdzie indziej. Liczba rozstrzygniętych obejmuje pracę wszystkich grup, dlatego rośnie szybciej, niż maleje Twoja lista.

rozstrzygnięte: 176 / 180 do odpowiedzi: 0

Ostatnie liczenie głosów: rozstrzygnięte: 176 · przekazane panelom międzygrupowym: 0 · sporne: 0 · poniżej kworum: 4 — panele potrzebują co najmniej max(2, 75% panelu) oddanych głosów; Twój najmniejszy panel ma 15 członków.

zamknij ✕

The metric was chosen because it was easy to log → wpływa? → The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds

Nikt jeszcze nic nie napisał.

Etap zakończony — zapis par i głosów jest powyżej.Sprawdź logikę ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	otwarte	dyskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	otwarte	dyskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	otwarte	dyskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	otwarte	dyskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ tak	dyskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ tak	dyskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ tak	dyskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ tak	dyskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ tak	dyskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ tak	dyskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ tak	dyskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ tak	dyskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ wywnioskowane	dyskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nie	w centrum uwagi ↑ · zamknij ✕
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nie	dyskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nie	dyskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nie	dyskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nie	dyskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nie	dyskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nie	dyskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nie	dyskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nie	dyskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nie	dyskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nie	dyskutuj
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ nie	dyskutuj
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ nie	dyskutuj