Carte · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Chaque salle sur cette question a construit sa propre carte ; elles sont fusionnées en une seule. La même affirmation soulevée dans deux salles est un seul élément, et chaque lien indique combien de salles l’ont trouvé. Là où des salles ont trouvé des choses opposées, chaque constat tient, avec le nombre de salles qui ont jugé le lien et l’ont trouvé.

Les salles ont validé ensemble des liens (51), mais aucun lien n’a été trouvé par plus d’une source indépendante (les salles qui partagent une source, ou votent comme une seule, comptent une fois) : il n’y a donc pas encore de carte commune. La carte de chaque salle reste séparée : Why do we stay inside echo chambers? (22), Why do people like filter bubbles? (21), Why do people prefer their own information bubble? (8). Une carte commune apparaît quand deux salles valident le même lien ; c’est une fiche qui circule entre les salles pendant la phase Proposition qui le rend possible.

LES SALLES DE CETTE CARTE

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

⚠ demo · up to 5 cards word for word the same as in 2 other rooms here

compte ses verdicts pèsent sur cette carte — steward trusted by this instance

Why do people like filter bubbles?

demo · stands 1 vouch from its source, trusted steward _9c10b0b91f

⚠ demo · up to 7 cards word for word the same as in 2 other rooms here

compte ses verdicts pèsent sur cette carte — vouched for by the steward of “Why do people prefer their own information bubble?”

Why do people prefer their own information bubble?

⚠ demo · up to 7 cards word for word the same as in 2 other rooms here

compte ses verdicts pèsent sur cette carte — steward trusted by this instance

Une salle compte dès que quelqu’un de responsable se porte garant d’elle. ● tranché avant qu’aucune carte soit publique ; ○ après.

SOULEVÉES DANS PLUS D’UNE SALLE · 14

People choose the sources that already agree with them	3 salles	sur la carte
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	3 salles	sur la carte
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	3 salles	sur la carte
The people most online are the least representative	2 salles	hors de la carte : aucun lien vers elle n’a été validé
The rules are written for one country and applied to forty	2 salles	hors de la carte : aucun lien vers elle n’a été validé
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	2 salles	sur la carte
Arguments online end in blocking, not in agreement	2 salles	sur la carte
Appeals go to the same system that made the decision	2 salles	hors de la carte : aucun lien vers elle n’a été validé
There is no shared set of facts to argue from any more	2 salles	sur la carte
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	2 salles	sur la carte
Local newspapers closed and nothing replaced them	2 salles	sur la carte
Schools do not teach how to read a source	2 salles	sur la carte

CE QUE LES SALLES FERAIENT

Chaque salle a jugé ses propres actions par rapport à ses propres causes profondes, aux trois quarts de ses propres votes. Rien ici n’est un vote entre salles : on compte, cause par cause, ce que chaque salle a trouvé. Une salle apparaît dès que sa phase Actions est close. Chaque numéro sur la carte marque une cause profonde que cette action réduit.

Réduite dans 1 salles sur 2:

Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed

① Fund local reporting from a levy on ad revenue · Why do people like filter bubbles?

Réduite dans 1 salle sur 1:

Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed

② Teach source-reading in every year, not one · Why do people prefer their own information bubble?

Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside

① Fund local reporting from a levy on ad revenue · Why do people like filter bubbles?

③ Teach source-checking in the last two years of school · Why do people like filter bubbles?

The metric was chosen because it was easy to log

④ Independent audit access under a legal safe harbour · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Aucune salle n’a trouvé d’action qui réduise celles-ci :

A report takes three days and the post has already done its work · jugée dans 1 salle
Being wrong in front of people you know is worse than being wrong · jugée dans 1 salle
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify · jugée dans 1 salle
Researchers ask for data and legal says no · jugée dans 1 salle
The problem is not what people believe but that believing has become an identity · jugée dans 1 salle

TROUVÉ PAR 1 SALLE · 51

People no longer meet anyone who disagrees with them in person	→	Disagreeing in public costs you socially, so most people stop
	→	Local newspapers closed and nothing replaced them
	→	Everyone assumes the other side is more extreme than it is
Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	→	A report takes three days and the post has already done its work
	→	The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching
Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applie	→	Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them
	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them
	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff
Correcting someone publicly makes them dig in harder	→	Local newspapers closed and nothing replaced them
Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	→	Schools do not teach how to read a source
Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	→	People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true
Subscription walls put good reporting behind a price and left the rest	→	Everyone assumes the other side is more extreme than it is
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed
A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	→	Removing a post makes it famous
Removing a post makes it famous	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre
	→	Everyone assumes the other side is more extreme than it is
	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them
	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no
	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest
	→	The same event is reported as two different events
	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages
	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds
Everyone assumes the other side is more extreme than it is	→	People I know now live in two different versions of the same country
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff
	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it
	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside
	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports
The same event is reported as two different events	→	People I know now live in two different versions of the same country
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A feed has no edges, so you cannot tell what you are not seeing
	→	The problem is not what people believe but that believing has become a
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right
The problem is not what people believe but that believing has become a	→	Being wrong in front of people you know is worse than being wrong
	→	Outrage travels further than accuracy, so it is what gets made
	→	Arguments online end in blocking, not in agreement
Being wrong in front of people you know is worse than being wrong	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before
	→	A newsroom now costs more than the advertising it can sell
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true
Outrage travels further than accuracy, so it is what gets made	→	There is no shared set of facts to argue from any more
	→	Arguments online end in blocking, not in agreement
A newsroom now costs more than the advertising it can sell	→	Outrage travels further than accuracy, so it is what gets made
There is no shared set of facts to argue from any more	→	A newsroom now costs more than the advertising it can sell

que faire à ce sujet →