True Causes
ZH
← 大厅
7/7 · 行动 · 正在查看选择阶段
30 人 · 32 个想法
点击任意已完成的阶段进行查看
✓
提出
✓
澄清
✓
归类
✓
选择
✓
结构
✓
地图
7
行动
演示 · 不计入
障碍 · 持有链接的任何人 · 公开列出 · 已开启联盟
主持人:它的主持人(已封存)
30 人 · 32 个想法 · 2 个小组 · 3 个房间 已结成联盟
通行证 → · 逻辑 → · 记录
↗ 分享这张地图
在其他网站上,作为实时地图:
作为图片: https://truecauses.org/d/55824a6/map.svg
作为数据: 本房间每一个已判断的卡片对(CSV). 每个主张都有自己的地址 /c/55824a6/<card>,列在地图下方。
发布时请注明出处: Causal map: True Causes, https://truecauses.org/d/55824a6
问题

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

把你的贴纸用在最重要的内容上。有证据支持的想法可以占用一个保留席位。

已关闭 · 返回行动阶段
正以访客身份查看。输入用户名即可加入并参与。
你的贴纸额度
每个想法最多一张,共 5 张。至少投一票。
有 5 个席位为被忽视的想法保留——附上链接提名一个,当 2 人认同来源相关时就会计入。
为什么
阶段结束时,一名被提名者通过随机抽签入选,其余按提名数入选,每个利益相关方类别最多一个。模型只检查页面是否关于同一主题——从不检查它是否证明了这个主张。那要由房间来判断;没有其他人支持的提名不能占用席位。
关闭 ✕
An appeal is judged by the system that made the decision
Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.
也曾在以下阶段讨论 · 提出 (1) · 澄清 (1) · 归类 (1) · 结构 (1) · 地图 (1)
还没有人发言。
类别 1
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it
Narrower than it reads; the wider version is someone else's card.
2 票讨论
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week
3 票讨论
类别 2
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds
Observed, not measured — I would want the data too.
5 票讨论
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages
3 票讨论
类别 3
Moderation is a cost centre and ranking is a profit centre
Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.
2 票讨论
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre
5 票讨论
未归类
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log
6 票讨论
Nobody can explain why a particular post was shown
2 票讨论
Nobody is promoted for the feature they did not ship
Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.
2 票讨论
An appeal is judged by the system that made the decision
Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.
A change that reduces engagement is reverted before anyone asks why
0 票讨论
The founders were twenty-five and nobody senior said stop
Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.
3 票讨论
Every external audit proposal dies in procurement
Meaning the recurring case, not one incident.
0 票
↳ 被提名占用席位: https://example.org/ops-incident-review.pdf could not read it (HTTPError) 1/2 人支持
讨论中(1)
We built for a scale nobody had governed before
5 票讨论
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest
Observed, not measured — I would want the data too.
5 票讨论
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it
Observed, not measured — I would want the data too.
14 票讨论
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports
Narrower than it reads; the wider version is someone else's card.
5 票讨论
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff
3 票讨论
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount
To be precise: this is about the situation, not a person.
6 票讨论
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify
1 票讨论
The team that would study long-term effects does not exist
0 票讨论
Harm shows up in a quarter and the review cycle is six weeks
Narrower than it reads; the wider version is someone else's card.
1 票讨论
Researchers ask for data and legal says no
6 票讨论
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside
8 票讨论
The model is retrained weekly and nobody diffs its behaviour
0 票讨论
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed
15 票讨论
The people who raise concerns are moved to another team
To be precise: this is about the situation, not a person.
0 票讨论
The company would rather be regulated than be sued
Meaning the recurring case, not one incident.
0 票讨论
People choose the sources that already agree with them
Automated removal is cheaper than being right
4 票讨论
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make
13 票讨论
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true
11 票讨论