Structuration · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

LA QUESTION

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

L’une influence-t-elle fortement l’autre ? Les trois quarts des votes exprimés décident.

Mode invité. Choisissez un pseudo pour rejoindre la salle et participer.

Les questions sont réparties entre les groupes : vous recevez celles attribuées à votre groupe — pas toutes les 180.

pourquoi

Personne ne pourrait répondre à plusieurs centaines de paires. Chaque paire va à un groupe ; une paire sur laquelle le groupe se divise est ensuite renvoyée à d’autres groupes, et peut donc apparaître plus tard dans votre liste même si elle a commencé ailleurs. Le nombre de paires tranchées inclut le travail de tous les groupes : c’est pourquoi il monte plus vite que votre propre liste ne diminue.

tranchées : 176 / 180 à vous de répondre : 0

Dernier décompte : tranchées : 176 · transmises à des panels inter-groupes : 0 · contestées : 0 · sous le quorum : 4 — les panels ont besoin d’au moins max(2, 75 % du panel) votes exprimés ; votre plus petit panel compte 15 membres.

fermer ✕

An appeal is judged by the system that made the decision

Scope: here specifically, not everywhere.

également discuté pendant la phase · Proposition (1) · Clarification (1) · Regroupement (1) · Carte (1)

This is the one that costs us most.

Phase terminée — l’archive des paires et des votes figure ci-dessus.Vérifier la logique ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	ouvert	discuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	ouvert	discuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	ouvert	discuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	ouvert	discuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ oui	discuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ oui	discuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ oui	discuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ oui	discuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ oui	discuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ oui	discuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ oui	discuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ oui	discuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ oui	discuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ oui	discuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ oui	discuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ oui	discuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ oui	discuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ oui	discuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ oui	discuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ oui	discuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ oui	discuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ oui	discuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ oui	discuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ oui	discuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ oui	discuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ déduit	discuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ non	discuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ non	discuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ non	discuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ non	discuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ non	discuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ non	discuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ non	discuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ non	discuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ non	discuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ non	discuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ non	discuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ non	discuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ non	discuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ non	discuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ non	discuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ non	discuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ non	discuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ non	discuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ non	discuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ non	discuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ non	discuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ non	discuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ non	discuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ non	discuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ non	discuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ non	discuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ non	discuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ non	discuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ non	discuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ non	discuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ non	discuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ non	discuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ non	discuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ non	discuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ non	discuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ non	discuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ non	discuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ non	discuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ non	discuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ non	discuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ non	discuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ non	discuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ non	discuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ non	discuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ non	discuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ non	discuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ non	discuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ non	discuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ non	discuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ non	discuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ non	discuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ non	discuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ non	discuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ non	discuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ non	discuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ non	discuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ non	discuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ non	discuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ non	discuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ non	discuter
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ non	discuter
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ non	discuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ non	discuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ non	discuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ non	discuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ non	discuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ non	discuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ non	discuter
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ non	discuter
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ non	discuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ non	discuter
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ non	discuter
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ non	discuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ non	discuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ non	discuter
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ non	discuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ non	discuter
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ non	discuter
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ non	discuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ non	discuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ non	discuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ non	discuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ non	discuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ non	discuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ non	discuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ non	discuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ non	discuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ non	discuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ non	discuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ non	discuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ non	discuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ non	discuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ non	discuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ non	discuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ non	discuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ non	discuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ non	discuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ non	discuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ non	discuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ non	discuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ non	discuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ non	discuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ non	discuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ non	discuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ non	discuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ non	discuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ non	discuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ non	discuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ non	discuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ non	discuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ non	discuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ non	discuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ non	discuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ non	discuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ non	discuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ non	discuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ non	discuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ non	discuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ non	discuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ non	discuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ non	discuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ non	discuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ non	discuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ non	discuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ non	discuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ non	discuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ non	discuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ non	discuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ non	discuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ non	discuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ non	discuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ non	discuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ non	discuter
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ non	discuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ non	discuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ non	discuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ non	discuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ non	discuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ non	discuter
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ non	discuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ non	discuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ non	discuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ non	discuter
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ non	discuter
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ non	discuter
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ non	discuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ non	discuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ non	discuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ non	discuter
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ non	discuter
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ non	discuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ non	discuter
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ non	discuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ non	discuter