True Causes
DA
← oversigten
7/7 · Handlinger · ser fasen Sortering
personer: 30 · idéer: 32
gennemgang · tælles ikke
forhindringer · alle med linket · offentligt listet · i sammenslutning
tovholder: dens tovholder (forseglet)
personer: 30 · idéer: 32 · 2 grupper · 3 rum i sammenslutning
Pas → · Logik → · protokol
↗ del dette kort
På et andet websted, som et levende kort:
Som billede: https://truecauses.org/d/55824a6/map.svg
Som data: alle vurderede par i dette rum (CSV). Hver påstand har sin egen adresse, /c/55824a6/<card>, listet under kortet.
Kreditering, når du offentliggør: Causal map: True Causes, https://truecauses.org/d/55824a6
SPØRGSMÅLET

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

Saml sedler, du synes ligner hinanden. Klynger gør væggen lettere at læse; de afgør intet.

Du ser med som gæst. Vælg et brugernavn for at komme med og deltage.
Klynger dannes ud fra lighed, navnene kommer sidst
Fast rækkefølge: kobl par af idéer, du synes ligner hinanden — koblinger er symmetriske (A~B er B~A; retningen betyder aldrig noget), og en kobling holder, når 2 medlemmer har lavet den.
hvorfor
Koblinger er symmetriske — A~B er B~A. Klynger er de grupper, der opstår af koblinger, der holder, og kun en dannet klynge kan navngives, af et menneske. Dine egne koblinger har et ✕, så du kan trække dem tilbage; du kan ikke fjerne andres. Klynger ordner væggen og spærrer aldrig for afstemningen — to sedler, der fremsætter samme PÅSTAND, skal lægges sammen i fasen Præcisering.
Koblinger og navne laves, mens fasen Sortering er åben; tovholderens ← genåbner den.
luk ✕
Harm shows up in a quarter and the review cycle is six weeks
Narrower than it reads; the wider version is someone else's card.
Intet sagt endnu.
unavngiven klynge — navngiv den, hvis sedlerne har en fælles tråd, eller lad den være unavngiven (2)
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week
~ We cannot publish wha…We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it (18)
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (13)
diskutér
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it
~ The people affected w…The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff (16)
~ An A/B test measures …An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week (18)
diskutér
unavngiven klynge — navngiv den, hvis sedlerne har en fælles tråd, eller lad den være unavngiven (2)
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages
~ The rules are forty p…The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds (17)
diskutér
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds
~ The rules are written…The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages (17)
diskutér
unavngiven klynge — navngiv den, hvis sedlerne har en fælles tråd, eller lad den være unavngiven (2)
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre
~ Moderation is a cost …Moderation is a cost centre and ranking is a profit centre (16)
diskutér
Moderation is a cost centre and ranking is a profit centre
~ A moderator sees the …A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre (16)
diskutér
· endnu ikke i en klynge (26)
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log
Nobody can explain why a particular post was shown
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (13)
~ Regulation asks for t…Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify (18)
diskutér
Nobody is promoted for the feature they did not ship
An appeal is judged by the system that made the decision
A change that reduces engagement is reverted before anyone asks why
The founders were twenty-five and nobody senior said stop
Every external audit proposal dies in procurement
We built for a scale nobody had governed before
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (12)
diskutér
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff
~ We cannot publish wha…We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it (16)
diskutér
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify
~ Nobody outside can re…Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make (18)
~ Nobody can explain wh…Nobody can explain why a particular post was shown (18)
diskutér
The team that would study long-term effects does not exist
Harm shows up in a quarter and the review cycle is six weeks
Researchers ask for data and legal says no
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside
The model is retrained weekly and nobody diffs its behaviour
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed
The people who raise concerns are moved to another team
The company would rather be regulated than be sued
People choose the sources that already agree with them
Automated removal is cheaper than being right
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make
~ We built for a scale …We built for a scale nobody had governed before (12)
~ An A/B test measures …An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week (13)
~ Regulation asks for t…Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify (18)
~ Nobody can explain wh…Nobody can explain why a particular post was shown (13)
diskutér
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true