구조 잡기 · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

질문

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

한쪽이 다른 쪽에 크게 영향을 줍니까? 던진 표의 4분의 3으로 정합니다.

게스트로 보는 중. 참여하려면 닉네임을 입력하세요.

질문은 그룹별로 나뉘어, 내 그룹이 받은 질문만 나옵니다. 전체 180개가 다 나오지는 않습니다.

이유

수백 개의 쌍을 혼자 답할 수는 없습니다. 각 쌍은 한 그룹에 갑니다. 의견이 갈린 쌍은 다른 그룹에 넘어가므로, 다른 곳에서 시작한 쌍이 나중에 내 목록에 나올 수 있습니다. 확정된 수에는 모든 그룹의 작업이 들어가므로, 내 목록이 줄어드는 것보다 빨리 늘어납니다.

확정 176 / 180 내가 답할 질문 0개

지난 집계: 결정 176 · 그룹 간 패널로 넘김 0 · 이견 있음 0 · 최소 인원 미달 4 — 패널마다 던진 표가 최소 max(2, 패널의 75%) 필요합니다. 가장 작은 패널의 멤버는 15명입니다.

닫기 ✕

Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true → 영향을 주나? → The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff

아직 아무 말도 없습니다.

끝난 단계입니다. 쌍과 투표 기록은 위에 있습니다.논리 확인 ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	미결	논의하기
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	미결	보는 중 ↑ · 닫기 ✕
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	미결	논의하기
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	미결	논의하기
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ 예	논의하기
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ 예	논의하기
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ 예	논의하기
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ 예	논의하기
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ 예	논의하기
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ 예	논의하기
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ 예	논의하기
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ 예	논의하기
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ 예	논의하기
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ 예	논의하기
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ 예	논의하기
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ 예	논의하기
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ 예	논의하기
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ 예	논의하기
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ 예	논의하기
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ 예	논의하기
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ 예	논의하기
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ 예	논의하기
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ 예	논의하기
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ 예	논의하기
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ 예	논의하기
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ 추론됨	논의하기
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 아니요	논의하기
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 아니요	논의하기