结构 · Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

问题

Why do we stay inside echo chambers?

一方是否显著影响另一方？达到所投票数的四分之三即为定论。

已关闭 · 返回行动阶段

正以访客身份查看。输入用户名即可加入并参与。

问题在各小组之间分配，所以你拿到的是分给你们小组的那些——不是全部 180 个。

为什么

没有人能回答几百个卡片对。每个卡片对交给一个小组；意见分裂的卡片对会再转给其他小组，所以它可能稍后出现在你的列表中，即使它起初在别处。已定数量包括所有小组的工作，所以它增长得比你自己的列表缩短得快。

已定 176 / 180 0 个待你回答

上次计票：176 个已定 · 0 个上交跨组评审组 · 0 个有争议 · 4 个未达法定人数 — 每个评审组至少需要 max(2, 评审组人数的 75%) 张票；你们最小的评审组有 15 名成员.

关闭 ✕

Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it → 有影响？ → Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify

还没有人发言。

已完成的阶段——卡片对和投票的记录见上方。检查逻辑 ↗

Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	未定	讨论
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	未定	讨论
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	未定	讨论
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	未定	讨论
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ 是	讨论
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✓ 是	讨论
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✓ 是	讨论
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ 是	讨论
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✓ 是	讨论
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✓ 是	讨论
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✓ 是	讨论
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ 是	讨论
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✓ 是	讨论
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ 是	讨论
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ 是	讨论
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✓ 是	讨论
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✓ 是	讨论
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✓ 是	讨论
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✓ 是	讨论
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ 是	讨论
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✓ 是	讨论
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ 是	讨论
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✓ 是	讨论
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ 是	讨论
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✓ 是	讨论
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✓ 推断	讨论
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 否	讨论
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 否	讨论
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 否	讨论
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 否	讨论
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 否	讨论
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 否	讨论
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 否	讨论
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 否	讨论
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 否	讨论
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 否	讨论
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 否	讨论
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 否	讨论
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 否	讨论
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 否	讨论
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 否	讨论
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 否	讨论
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 否	讨论
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 否	讨论
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 否	讨论
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 否	讨论
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 否	讨论
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 否	讨论
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 否	讨论
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 否	讨论
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 否	讨论
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 否	讨论
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 否	讨论
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 否	讨论
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 否	讨论
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 否	讨论
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 否	讨论
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 否	讨论
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 否	讨论
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 否	讨论
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 否	讨论
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 否	讨论
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 否	讨论
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 否	讨论
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 否	讨论
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 否	讨论
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 否	讨论
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 否	讨论
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 否	讨论
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 否	讨论
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 否	讨论
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 否	讨论
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 否	讨论
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 否	讨论
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 否	讨论
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 否	讨论
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside	✗ 否	讨论
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 否	讨论
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ 否	讨论
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 否	讨论
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 否	讨论
There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 否	讨论
A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	→	The rules are written in one country and applied in forty languages	✗ 否	讨论
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	✗ 否	讨论
Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 否	讨论
The metric was chosen because it was easy to log	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 否	讨论
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Safety work has no metric, so it has no headcount	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	There is no reviewer who speaks the language of half the reports	✗ 否	讨论
The rules are forty pages and the decision takes twelve seconds	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 否	讨论
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	A moderator sees the worst of it for the wage of a call centre	✗ 否	讨论
Researchers ask for data and legal says no	→	Automated removal is cheaper than being right	✗ 否	讨论
Automated removal is cheaper than being right	→	Researchers ask for data and legal says no	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 否	讨论
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 否	讨论
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 否	讨论
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 否	讨论
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 否	讨论
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 否	讨论
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 否	讨论
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 否	讨论
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 否	讨论
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 否	讨论
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 否	讨论
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 否	讨论
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 否	讨论
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 否	讨论
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 否	讨论
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 否	讨论
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 否	讨论
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 否	讨论
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 否	讨论
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 否	讨论
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 否	讨论
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 否	讨论
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 否	讨论
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 否	讨论
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 否	讨论
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 否	讨论
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 否	讨论
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 否	讨论
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 否	讨论
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 否	讨论
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 否	讨论
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 否	讨论
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 否	讨论
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 否	讨论
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 否	讨论
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 否	讨论
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 否	讨论
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 否	讨论
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	✗ 否	讨论
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 否	讨论
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 否	讨论
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 否	讨论
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 否	讨论
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 否	讨论
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 否	当前焦点 ↑ · 关闭 ✕
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 否	讨论
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 否	讨论
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ 否	讨论
Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	✗ 否	讨论
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 否	讨论
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 否	讨论
Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 否	讨论
The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	→	An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	✗ 否	讨论
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 否	讨论
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	Nobody outside can reproduce a single claim we make	✗ 否	讨论
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Regulation asks for transparency reports nobody can verify	✗ 否	讨论
We cannot publish what we remove without teaching people to evade it	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 否	讨论
An A/B test measures engagement because that is what we can measure in a week	→	We built for a scale nobody had governed before	✗ 否	讨论
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 否	讨论
We built for a scale nobody had governed before	→	Every fix ships to the users who complain loudest	✗ 否	讨论
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The people affected worst are in markets we do not staff	✗ 否	讨论