True Causes
EN
← lobby
7/7 · Actions · viewing Generate
30 people · 33 ideas
walkthrough · not counted
obstacles · anyone with the link · listed publicly · federation on
stewarded by its steward (sealed)
30 people · 33 ideas · 2 groups · 7 rooms federated
Passport → · Logic → · record
↗ share this map
On another site, as a live map:
As a picture: https://truecauses.org/d/5aea4e8/map.svg
As data: every judged pair in this room (CSV). Each claim has its own address, /c/5aea4e8/<card>, listed under the map.
Credit when you publish: Causal map: True Causes, https://truecauses.org/d/5aea4e8
THE QUESTION

Why do the people behind atrocities escape justice?

closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
close ✕
Funding goes to an international agency that subcontracts to us
Nothing said yet.
Nobody counted our dead until a foreigner died
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
We do the work and they hold the mandate and the visibility
cluster 3discuss
Neutrality is demanded of us and not of those who armed them
We needed a road closed in March and got flour in September
Our own organisations are told they lack capacity
cluster 4discuss
Funding goes to an international agency that subcontracts to us
Balance is a property of coverage, not of what happened
We are described as a community, never consulted as one
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
Nobody coordinated, so we relived it eleven times
We are asked to testify for a court and not asked what would have stopped it
cluster 5discuss
A country becomes real to them when their own citizens are in it
Aid arrives after the killing and is called a response
Justice is offered as a substitute for protection
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
cluster 1discuss
We were interviewed eleven times by eleven organisations
Nobody came back to tell us what happened to what we sent
Nobody has ever asked us what warning would have been believed
The evidence we gave was used in a report we never saw
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
cluster 2discuss
The people who decide have never met anyone from there
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
cluster 1discuss
Passports decide whose death is an event
Our relatives were killed and that is called bias
We told them, with names and dates, and were asked for more evidence
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
cluster 5discuss
A generation grows up in a place designed for six months
Each one needed our testimony for its own report
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
cluster 4discuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished
Being from here is treated as a conflict of interest
A local organisation cannot get insurance, so it cannot get the grant
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
Every state judges the case by what it costs them
The word 'both sides' was used about a house with a family in it
cluster 2discuss
The report was published in a language we do not read
cluster 3discuss
We were warned to be careful because the diaspora is emotional
The camp is built and the return is never planned
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.