THE QUESTION
Why do the people behind atrocities escape justice?
Spend your stickers on what matters most. An idea with evidence can take a held seat.
closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
Your sticker budget
One per idea, 5 total. Floor is one vote.
5 places are held for overlooked ideas — nominate one with a link, and it counts once 2 people agree the source is relevant.
why
At stage close one nominee enters by random draw and the rest by nomination count, at most one per stakeholder class. A model checks only whether the page is about the same subject — never whether it proves the claim. That judgement is the room's, and a nomination nobody else stands behind takes no seat.
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
cluster 1
Nothing said yet.
CLUSTER 1
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
15 votesin focus ↑ · close ✕
The people who decide have never met anyone from there
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
9 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 2
The evidence we gave was used in a report we never saw
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
0 votesdiscuss
The word 'both sides' was used about a house with a family in it
0 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 3
We do the work and they hold the mandate and the visibility
9 votesdiscuss
The report was published in a language we do not read
2 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 4
Our own organisations are told they lack capacity
3 votesdiscuss
Each one needed our testimony for its own report
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
1 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 5
We are asked to testify for a court and not asked what would have stopped it
6 votesdiscuss
We told them, with names and dates, and were asked for more evidence
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
1 votes
↳ nominated for a seat: https://example.org/ops-incident-review.pdf could not read it (HTTPError) 1 of 2 behind it
discussNOT CLUSTERED
Nobody counted our dead until a foreigner died
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
2 votesdiscuss
Neutrality is demanded of us and not of those who armed them
1 votesdiscuss
We needed a road closed in March and got flour in September
5 votesdiscuss
Funding goes to an international agency that subcontracts to us
0 votesdiscuss
Balance is a property of coverage, not of what happened
3 votesdiscuss
We are described as a community, never consulted as one
0 votesdiscuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
15 votesdiscuss
Nobody coordinated, so we relived it eleven times
2 votesdiscuss
A country becomes real to them when their own citizens are in it
0 votesdiscuss
Aid arrives after the killing and is called a response
0 votesdiscuss
Justice is offered as a substitute for protection
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
4 votesdiscuss
We were interviewed eleven times by eleven organisations
0 votesdiscuss
Nobody came back to tell us what happened to what we sent
11 votesdiscuss
Nobody has ever asked us what warning would have been believed
2 votesdiscuss
Passports decide whose death is an event
1 votesdiscuss
Our relatives were killed and that is called bias
0 votesdiscuss
A generation grows up in a place designed for six months
5 votesdiscuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished
15 votesdiscuss
Being from here is treated as a conflict of interest
2 votesdiscuss
A local organisation cannot get insurance, so it cannot get the grant
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
4 votesdiscuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them
14 votesdiscuss
We were warned to be careful because the diaspora is emotional
5 votesdiscussing (1)
The camp is built and the return is never planned
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
0 votesdiscuss