THE QUESTION
Why do the people behind atrocities escape justice?
Spend your stickers on what matters most. An idea with evidence can take a held seat.
closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
Your sticker budget
One per idea, 5 total. Floor is one vote.
5 places are held for overlooked ideas — nominate one with a link, and it counts once 2 people agree the source is relevant.
why
At stage close one nominee enters by random draw and the rest by nomination count, at most one per stakeholder class. A model checks only whether the page is about the same subject — never whether it proves the claim. That judgement is the room's, and a nomination nobody else stands behind takes no seat.
The camp is built and the return is never planned
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
Nothing said yet.
CLUSTER 1
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
15 votesdiscuss
The people who decide have never met anyone from there
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
9 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 2
The evidence we gave was used in a report we never saw
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
0 votesdiscuss
The word 'both sides' was used about a house with a family in it
0 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 3
We do the work and they hold the mandate and the visibility
9 votesdiscuss
The report was published in a language we do not read
2 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 4
Our own organisations are told they lack capacity
3 votesdiscuss
Each one needed our testimony for its own report
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
1 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 5
We are asked to testify for a court and not asked what would have stopped it
6 votesdiscuss
We told them, with names and dates, and were asked for more evidence
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
1 votes
↳ nominated for a seat: https://example.org/ops-incident-review.pdf could not read it (HTTPError) 1 of 2 behind it
discussNOT CLUSTERED
Nobody counted our dead until a foreigner died
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
2 votesdiscuss
Neutrality is demanded of us and not of those who armed them
1 votesdiscuss
We needed a road closed in March and got flour in September
5 votesdiscuss
Funding goes to an international agency that subcontracts to us
0 votesdiscuss
Balance is a property of coverage, not of what happened
3 votesdiscuss
We are described as a community, never consulted as one
0 votesdiscuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
15 votesdiscuss
Nobody coordinated, so we relived it eleven times
2 votesdiscuss
A country becomes real to them when their own citizens are in it
0 votesdiscuss
Aid arrives after the killing and is called a response
0 votesdiscuss
Justice is offered as a substitute for protection
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
4 votesdiscuss
We were interviewed eleven times by eleven organisations
0 votesdiscuss
Nobody came back to tell us what happened to what we sent
11 votesdiscuss
Nobody has ever asked us what warning would have been believed
2 votesdiscuss
Passports decide whose death is an event
1 votesdiscuss
Our relatives were killed and that is called bias
0 votesdiscuss
A generation grows up in a place designed for six months
5 votesdiscuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished
15 votesdiscuss
Being from here is treated as a conflict of interest
2 votesdiscuss
A local organisation cannot get insurance, so it cannot get the grant
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
4 votesdiscuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them
14 votesdiscuss
We were warned to be careful because the diaspora is emotional
5 votesdiscussing (1)
The camp is built and the return is never planned
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
0 votesin focus ↑ · close ✕