問い
Why do affected communities rarely see the link between local pollution and their own health?
一方は他方に大きく影響しますか？投じられた票の4分の3で決まります。
終了 · 対策に戻る
ゲストとして閲覧中。参加するにはユーザー名を入力してください。
問いはグループに分配されるので、あなたに届くのは自分のグループに割り当てられたものだけです（全90件ではありません）。
決着 25/90 あなたの回答待ち：0 争いあり：18（保留、表示中） 理由
数百ものペアに答えられる人はいません。各ペアは一つのグループに渡され、意見が割れたペアは他のグループに回されます。そのため、別のところで始まったペアが後からあなたの一覧に現れることがあります。決着の数にはすべてのグループの作業が含まれるので、自分の一覧が減るより速く増えていきます。
前回の集計：決着 7 · グループ横断パネルへ回付 0 · 争いあり 18 · 定足数未満 65 — パネルには max(2, パネルの75%) 以上の票が必要です。最小のパネルのメンバーは12人です.
They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. → 影響する？ → Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue.
I can't say if the weakening of the water standard directly influences the union rep's choice between immediate job loss or long-term health risks. I don't know the full context of the union rep's decision-making process.
They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us.
n
The weakening of the water standard without explanation of the health link does not directly influence the lack of permit or water test result sharing with the community.
I've seen the impact of unregulated pollution on communities, and I know that the union rep's concerns about jobs and health are separate from the treaty rights issue, which is about the weakening of the water standard and the lack of explanation for the health link.
I can't judge the treaty-rights claim or what the union man is weighing — I've never seen the permit or the rules, only the water.
I have seen the weakening of water standards and the non‑explanation of health links directly create the conditions that force the union rep's jobs‑versus‑health dilemma, as the same power dynamics that erode my treaty rights also shape workplace safety choices on the ground.
モデレーター The union rep's dilemma comes from the economic and enforcement pressure around compliance, not from the specific weakening of the treaty-standard with no health explanation. I see those as different fights.
完了した段階です。ペアと投票の記録は上にあります。論理を確かめる ↗
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（5） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（11） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（12） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（15） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（12） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（8） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（10） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（11） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（10） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（12） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（7） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未決 | 議論中（15） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（13） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（12） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（12） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（15） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（4） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未決 | 議論中（13） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（12） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（14） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 表示中 ↑ · 閉じる ✕ |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未決 | 議論中（13） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（15） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（12） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未決 | 議論中（13） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未決 | 議論中（12） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ✓ はい | 議論中（11） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ✓ はい | 議論中（11） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ✓ はい | 議論中（9） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（9） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（6） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（8） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（6） |