CÂU HỎI
Why do affected communities rarely see the link between local pollution and their own health?
Liệu cái này có ảnh hưởng đáng kể đến cái kia không? Ba phần tư số phiếu đã bỏ sẽ quyết định.
đã đóng · quay lại giai đoạn Biện pháp
Đang xem với tư cách khách. Nhập tên người dùng để vào và tham gia.
Các câu hỏi được chia cho các nhóm, nên bạn nhận những câu được giao cho nhóm mình — không phải cả 90 câu.
25 / 90 đã ngã ngũ 0 câu chờ bạn trả lời 18 còn tranh cãi (tạm gác, vẫn hiển thị) vì sao
Không ai trả lời nổi vài trăm cặp thẻ. Mỗi cặp được giao cho một nhóm; cặp nào bị chia rẽ sẽ được chuyển sang các nhóm khác, nên nó có thể xuất hiện trong danh sách của bạn sau này dù bắt đầu ở nơi khác. Số đã ngã ngũ tính cả công việc của mọi nhóm, vì vậy nó tăng nhanh hơn tốc độ danh sách của bạn ngắn lại.
Lần kiểm phiếu gần nhất: 7 đã quyết · 0 chuyển lên hội đồng liên nhóm · 18 còn tranh cãi · 65 chưa đủ số người tối thiểu — hội đồng cần ít nhất max(2, 75% hội đồng) phiếu đã bỏ; hội đồng nhỏ nhất của bạn có 12 thành viên.
The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. → ảnh hưởng? → Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick.
I've seen that enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards that don't account for local conditions, but I don't know how these standards affect the people who write the rules.
Public relations drafts often link arbitrary standards to lack of community feedback loops.
The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with.
I’ve observed that a lack of local understanding leads to dissatisfaction and a feeling of being ignored.
The person has firsthand knowledge of the enforcement numbers being based on arbitrary standards, but cannot comment on the specific claim about the creek and creek sickness.
The two claims seem to be saying the same thing, just in different words. The people who write the rules are far away from the communities they affect, and they don't account for local conditions.
What I can say: nobody has ever come back to this street to explain a single rule or a single discolored day. Whether distant standards cause that silence, or the silence causes the standards — that ordering I can't see from here.
I have seen enforcement numbers cited as based on standards set by people far from the communities, and the lack of follow-up feedback (as described in A) is part of why those standards remain disconnected and unchallenged.
người kiểm duyệt I put enforcement numbers in the statute but I cannot see how inspectors on the ground actually enforce them.
Giai đoạn đã xong — hồ sơ các cặp thẻ và phiếu bầu nằm ở trên.Kiểm tra lập luận ↗
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (5) |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (11) |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (12) |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (9) |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (15) |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (9) |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (9) |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (12) |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (9) |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (9) |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (8) |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (9) |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (10) |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (11) |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (9) |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (10) |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (12) |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ còn tranh cãi | đang thảo luận (7) |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (10) |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (11) |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (11) |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (15) |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (13) |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (12) |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (12) |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (10) |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (15) |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (6) |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (9) |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (9) |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (4) |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (10) |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (7) |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (10) |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (13) |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (12) |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (14) |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (9) |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (7) |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (13) |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (9) |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (7) |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (10) |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (6) |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (10) |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (10) |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (15) |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (10) |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (6) |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (11) |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (11) |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (11) |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (7) |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (10) |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (7) |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (6) |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | đang mở | đang mở ↑ · đóng ✕ |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (6) |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (12) |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (11) |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (7) |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (13) |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (6) |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (11) |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (7) |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (9) |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (12) |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (8) |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (7) |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | đang mở | đang thảo luận (11) |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ✓ có | đang thảo luận (11) |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ✓ có | đang thảo luận (11) |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ✓ có | đang thảo luận (9) |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | ✗ không | đang thảo luận (9) |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ✗ không | đang thảo luận (6) |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | ✗ không | đang thảo luận (8) |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | ✗ không | đang thảo luận (6) |