问题
Why do affected communities rarely see the link between local pollution and their own health?
一方是否显著影响另一方？达到所投票数的四分之三即为定论。
已关闭 · 返回行动阶段
正以访客身份查看。输入用户名即可加入并参与。
问题在各小组之间分配，所以你拿到的是分给你们小组的那些——不是全部 90 个。
已定 25 / 90 0 个待你回答 18 个有争议（已搁置，可见） 为什么
没有人能回答几百个卡片对。每个卡片对交给一个小组；意见分裂的卡片对会再转给其他小组，所以它可能稍后出现在你的列表中，即使它起初在别处。已定数量包括所有小组的工作，所以它增长得比你自己的列表缩短得快。
上次计票：7 个已定 · 0 个上交跨组评审组 · 18 个有争议 · 65 个未达法定人数 — 每个评审组至少需要 max(2, 评审组人数的 75%) 张票；你们最小的评审组有 12 名成员.
We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. → 有影响？ → The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made.
I have seen draft legislation remove environmental review.
I've seen how we sometimes downplay results that don't fit the narrative, so knowing we frame health risks as industry-wide trends rather than site-specific hazards does influence the decision to remove the legal requirement to study health impacts.
I have drafted rollback language.
I know that framing health risks as industry-wide trends prevents communities from linking specific hazards to our facilities. The rollback language removing the legal requirement to study health impacts is a separate action, but it does align with the broader trend of not making specific links to our facilities.
I have seen draft language remove requirements for studies.
I see our public framing strategy aligns with the legislative lobbying to remove study requirements.
I've seen how our reports frame risks as industry-wide trends, not specific to any site. But I don't know how this affects the rollback language or the draft bill's impact on health impact studies.
I have seen reports that obscure specific facility impacts.
I have seen the internal cost-benefit memos where we draft language to avoid specific health impact studies.
I've seen how our reports frame risks as industry-wide trends, not specific to our site. But I don't know how this ties to the rollback language in the bill.
The author does not know the full toxicology data; they only know symptoms, not thresholds, so they cannot say whether the safe number influences the health risk.
The author's statement about removing the legal requirement to study health impacts shows that the first claim does significantly influence the second.
I've seen how the public reporting is framed, and I know that the rollback language removes the mechanism to formally link health impacts to the plant's actions.
I've never seen the permit or any report from the plant, industry-wide or otherwise, so I can't say what their reporting does to what gets drafted. What I know is this: some mornings the creek runs gray and smells like chemicals, and nobody has ever told me why or tested it where my grandkids play.
版主 I am the one drafting the rollback language that removes the only requirement to study health impacts on the people downwind.
已完成的阶段——卡片对和投票的记录见上方。检查逻辑 ↗
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（5） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（11） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（12） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（9） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（15） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（9） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（9） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（12） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（9） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（9） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（8） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（9） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（10） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（11） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（9） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（10） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（12） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 有争议 | 讨论中（7） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未定 | 讨论中（10） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未定 | 讨论中（11） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未定 | 讨论中（11） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未定 | 讨论中（15） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未定 | 讨论中（13） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未定 | 讨论中（12） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未定 | 讨论中（12） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未定 | 讨论中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未定 | 讨论中（15） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未定 | 讨论中（6） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未定 | 讨论中（9） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未定 | 讨论中（9） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未定 | 讨论中（4） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未定 | 讨论中（10） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未定 | 讨论中（7） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未定 | 讨论中（10） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未定 | 讨论中（13） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未定 | 讨论中（12） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未定 | 讨论中（14） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未定 | 讨论中（9） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未定 | 讨论中（7） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未定 | 讨论中（13） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未定 | 讨论中（9） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未定 | 讨论中（7） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未定 | 讨论中（10） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未定 | 讨论中（6） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未定 | 讨论中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未定 | 讨论中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未定 | 当前焦点 ↑ · 关闭 ✕ |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未定 | 讨论中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未定 | 讨论中（6） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未定 | 讨论中（11） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未定 | 讨论中（11） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未定 | 讨论中（11） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未定 | 讨论中（7） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未定 | 讨论中（10） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未定 | 讨论中（7） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未定 | 讨论中（6） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未定 | 讨论中（9） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未定 | 讨论中（6） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未定 | 讨论中（12） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未定 | 讨论中（11） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未定 | 讨论中（7） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未定 | 讨论中（13） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未定 | 讨论中（6） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未定 | 讨论中（11） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未定 | 讨论中（7） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未定 | 讨论中（9） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未定 | 讨论中（12） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未定 | 讨论中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未定 | 讨论中（7） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未定 | 讨论中（11） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ✓ 是 | 讨论中（11） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ✓ 是 | 讨论中（11） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ✓ 是 | 讨论中（9） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | ✗ 否 | 讨论中（9） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ✗ 否 | 讨论中（6） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | ✗ 否 | 讨论中（8） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | ✗ 否 | 讨论中（6） |