問い
Why do affected communities rarely see the link between local pollution and their own health?
一方は他方に大きく影響しますか？投じられた票の4分の3で決まります。
終了 · 対策に戻る
ゲストとして閲覧中。参加するにはユーザー名を入力してください。
問いはグループに分配されるので、あなたに届くのは自分のグループに割り当てられたものだけです（全90件ではありません）。
決着 25/90 あなたの回答待ち：0 争いあり：18（保留、表示中） 理由
数百ものペアに答えられる人はいません。各ペアは一つのグループに渡され、意見が割れたペアは他のグループに回されます。そのため、別のところで始まったペアが後からあなたの一覧に現れることがあります。決着の数にはすべてのグループの作業が含まれるので、自分の一覧が減るより速く増えていきます。
前回の集計：決着 7 · グループ横断パネルへ回付 0 · 争いあり 18 · 定足数未満 65 — パネルには max(2, パネルの75%) 以上の票が必要です。最小のパネルのメンバーは12人です.
Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. → 影響する？ → We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting.
I have seen industry reports obscure local risks.
I can't say anything about how health risks are framed in public reporting because I don't have any insight into that process.
Without community-driven studies, our public framing defaults to industry-wide trends to minimize exposure.
The author does not mention any personal experience or data that would allow them to say whether A significantly influences B.
I don't have enough information to determine the relationship.
The person does not have information about the framing of health risks as industry-wide trends, only their own experience with the lack of political representation.
I've seen communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, and I've seen the pollution-health link go uninvestigated and unacknowledged. I've also seen the rollback language I draft remove the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made.
Nobody ever told us anything about 'industry-wide trends' or anything else — I've never seen a report or a permit, so I can't say what their reporting does or why.
I have seen the same fight repeat on a twenty-year cycle, and who benefits from people forgetting; industry framing as general trends (B) goes unchallenged when communities lack representation (A).
完了した段階です。ペアと投票の記録は上にあります。論理を確かめる ↗
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（5） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（11） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（12） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（15） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 争いあり | 表示中 ↑ · 閉じる ✕ |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（12） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（8） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（10） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（11） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（9） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（10） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（12） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（7） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未決 | 議論中（15） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（13） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（12） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（12） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（15） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（4） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未決 | 議論中（13） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（12） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（14） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未決 | 議論中（13） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（15） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未決 | 議論中（10） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | 未決 | 議論中（12） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未決 | 議論中（13） |
| Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | 未決 | 議論中（6） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| The rollback language I draft removes the legal requirement to study health impacts, so the link is never formally made. | → | Communities lack political representation to demand health impact studies, so the pollution-health link is never formally investigated. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | 未決 | 議論中（9） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | 未決 | 議論中（12） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | 未決 | 議論中（8） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未決 | 議論中（7） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Nobody ever shows us the permit or tells us what's in the water, so we can't connect it to our sickness. | 未決 | 議論中（11） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | ✓ はい | 議論中（11） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | The enforcement numbers are based on arbitrary standards set by people far away from the communities I work with. | ✓ はい | 議論中（11） |
| We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | → | They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | ✓ はい | 議論中（9） |
| Because the people who write the rules never come back to tell you how the rules broke your creek—and how it’s making you sick. | → | Union rep for plant workers says a shutdown for non‑compliance costs jobs immediately, while a weak rule endangers his members' health for over twenty years and he must choose which fight to pursue. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（9） |
| I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | → | We frame health risks as industry-wide trends, not site-specific hazards, in our public reporting. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（6） |
| I know the 'safe' number I'm writing into law was never meant to protect the people living near the plant. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（8） |
| They keep weakening the water standard my treaty rights depend on, and never explain the health link to us. | → | I cannot identify a cause that is not already listed because the wall already contains fifteen distinct reasons. Therefore, I answer with the word *nothing*. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（6） |