Strukturering · What would be true of a public transport system that served its most vulnerable

SPØRGSMÅLET

What would be true of a public transport system that served its most vulnerable users well?

Ville den ene hjælpe med at opnå den anden? Tre fjerdedele af de afgivne stemmer afgør det.

Du ser med som gæst. Vælg et brugernavn for at komme med og deltage.

Spørgsmålene fordeles mellem grupperne, så du får dem, din gruppe fik tildelt — ikke alle 90.

hvorfor

Ingen kunne svare på flere hundrede par. Hvert par går til én gruppe; et par, der deler gruppen, sendes derefter videre til andre grupper, så det kan dukke op på din liste senere, selvom det startede et andet sted. Antallet af afgjorte tæller alle gruppers arbejde, og derfor stiger det hurtigere, end din egen liste skrumper.

9 / 90 afgjort 0 til dig at besvare omstridte (parkeret, synlige): 2

Seneste optælling: afgjort: 7 · sendt videre til tværgående paneler: 0 · omstridt: 2 · under kvorum: 81 — paneler skal have mindst max(2, 75 % af panelet) afgivne stemmer; dit mindste panel har 12 medlemmer.

luk ✕

The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased. → påvirker? → The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.

I see at first hand that my aggregate models flatten individual experience and are biased; they do not change the physical stop, bus, or route a rider encounters.

I've seen that the model's data doesn't change how the bus actually runs; the route is the same regardless.

Afsluttet fase — historikken over par og stemmer står ovenfor.Tjek logikken ↗

The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	⚑ omstridt	diskuteres (5)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	⚑ omstridt	diskuteres (3)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	åben	diskuteres (8)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	åben	diskuteres (4)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	åben	diskuteres (2)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	åben	diskuteres (3)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	åben	diskuteres (6)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	åben	diskuteres (2)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	åben	diskuteres (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	åben	diskuteres (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	åben	diskuteres (3)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	åben	diskuteres (4)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	åben	diskuteres (1)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	åben	diskuteres (7)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	åben	diskuteres (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	åben	diskuteres (2)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	åben	i fokus ↑ · luk ✕
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	åben	diskuteres (2)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	åben	diskuteres (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	åben	diskuteres (8)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	åben	diskuteres (3)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	åben	diskuteres (8)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	åben	diskuteres (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	åben	diskuteres (7)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	åben	diskuteres (4)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	åben	diskuteres (7)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	åben	diskuteres (3)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	åben	diskuteres (1)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	åben	diskuteres (3)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	åben	diskuteres (7)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	åben	diskuteres (4)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	åben	diskuteres (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	åben	diskuteres (5)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	åben	diskuteres (6)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	åben	diskuteres (2)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	åben	diskuteres (8)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	åben	diskutér
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	åben	diskuteres (5)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	åben	diskuteres (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	åben	diskuteres (7)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	åben	diskuteres (4)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	åben	diskuteres (5)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	åben	diskuteres (1)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	åben	diskuteres (8)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	åben	diskuteres (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	åben	diskuteres (6)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	åben	diskuteres (1)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	åben	diskuteres (7)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	åben	diskuteres (5)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	åben	diskuteres (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	åben	diskuteres (5)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	åben	diskuteres (4)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	åben	diskuteres (4)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	åben	diskuteres (4)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	åben	diskuteres (6)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	åben	diskuteres (5)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	åben	diskuteres (2)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	åben	diskuteres (3)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	åben	diskuteres (4)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	åben	diskuteres (5)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	åben	diskuteres (2)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	åben	diskuteres (4)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	åben	diskuteres (4)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	åben	diskuteres (3)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	åben	diskuteres (3)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	åben	diskuteres (5)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	åben	diskuteres (6)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	åben	diskuteres (3)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	åben	diskuteres (5)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	åben	diskuteres (7)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	åben	diskuteres (3)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	åben	diskuteres (2)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	åben	diskuteres (5)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	åben	diskuteres (8)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	åben	diskuteres (2)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	åben	diskuteres (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	åben	diskuteres (4)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	åben	diskuteres (4)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	åben	diskuteres (1)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	åben	diskuteres (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	åben	diskuteres (3)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	åben	diskuteres (7)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	åben	diskuteres (5)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	✗ nej	diskuteres (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	✗ nej	diskuteres (2)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	✗ nej	diskuteres (3)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	✗ nej	diskuteres (5)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	✗ nej	diskuteres (1)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	✗ nej	diskuteres (5)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	✗ nej	diskuteres (1)