Structuration · What would be true of a public transport system that served its most vulnerable

LA QUESTION

What would be true of a public transport system that served its most vulnerable users well?

L’une aiderait-elle à réaliser l’autre ? Les trois quarts des votes exprimés décident.

Mode invité. Choisissez un pseudo pour rejoindre la salle et participer.

Les questions sont réparties entre les groupes : vous recevez celles attribuées à votre groupe — pas toutes les 90.

pourquoi

Personne ne pourrait répondre à plusieurs centaines de paires. Chaque paire va à un groupe ; une paire sur laquelle le groupe se divise est ensuite renvoyée à d’autres groupes, et peut donc apparaître plus tard dans votre liste même si elle a commencé ailleurs. Le nombre de paires tranchées inclut le travail de tous les groupes : c’est pourquoi il monte plus vite que votre propre liste ne diminue.

tranchées : 9 / 90 à vous de répondre : 0 contestées : 2 (mises de côté, visibles)

Dernier décompte : tranchées : 7 · transmises à des panels inter-groupes : 0 · contestées : 2 · sous le quorum : 81 — les panels ont besoin d’au moins max(2, 75 % du panel) votes exprimés ; votre plus petit panel compte 12 membres.

fermer ✕

The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son. → influence ? → Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.

Even if my bus is quiet and on time, I know other regions still have broken lifts and drivers who don't follow the rules — one bus doesn't make a standard.

The author's firsthand experience with the system's failures directly supports the conclusion that A does not significantly influence B.

Phase terminée — l’archive des paires et des votes figure ci-dessus.Vérifier la logique ↗

The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	⚑ contesté	discussion (5)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	⚑ contesté	discussion (3)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	ouvert	discussion (8)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	ouvert	discussion (4)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	ouvert	discussion (2)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	ouvert	discussion (3)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	ouvert	discussion (6)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	ouvert	discussion (2)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	ouvert	discussion (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	ouvert	discussion (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	ouvert	discussion (3)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	ouvert	discussion (4)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	ouvert	discussion (1)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	ouvert	discussion (7)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	ouvert	discussion (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	ouvert	discussion (2)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	ouvert	discussion (2)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	ouvert	discussion (2)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	ouvert	discussion (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	ouvert	discussion (8)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	ouvert	discussion (3)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	ouvert	discussion (8)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	ouvert	discussion (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	ouvert	discussion (7)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	ouvert	discussion (4)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	ouvert	discussion (7)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	ouvert	discussion (3)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	ouvert	discussion (1)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	ouvert	discussion (3)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	ouvert	discussion (7)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	ouvert	discussion (4)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	ouvert	discussion (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	ouvert	discussion (5)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	ouvert	discussion (6)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	ouvert	au premier plan ↑ · fermer ✕
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	ouvert	discussion (8)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	ouvert	discuter
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	ouvert	discussion (5)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	ouvert	discussion (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	ouvert	discussion (7)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	ouvert	discussion (4)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	ouvert	discussion (5)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	ouvert	discussion (1)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	ouvert	discussion (8)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	ouvert	discussion (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	ouvert	discussion (6)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	ouvert	discussion (1)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	ouvert	discussion (7)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	ouvert	discussion (5)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	ouvert	discussion (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	ouvert	discussion (5)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	ouvert	discussion (4)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	ouvert	discussion (4)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	ouvert	discussion (4)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	ouvert	discussion (6)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	ouvert	discussion (5)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	ouvert	discussion (2)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	ouvert	discussion (3)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	ouvert	discussion (4)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	ouvert	discussion (5)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	ouvert	discussion (2)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	ouvert	discussion (4)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	ouvert	discussion (4)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	ouvert	discussion (3)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	ouvert	discussion (3)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	ouvert	discussion (5)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	ouvert	discussion (6)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	ouvert	discussion (3)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	ouvert	discussion (5)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	ouvert	discussion (7)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	ouvert	discussion (3)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	ouvert	discussion (2)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	ouvert	discussion (5)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	ouvert	discussion (8)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	ouvert	discussion (2)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	ouvert	discussion (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	ouvert	discussion (4)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	ouvert	discussion (4)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	ouvert	discussion (1)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	ouvert	discussion (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	ouvert	discussion (3)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	ouvert	discussion (7)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	ouvert	discussion (5)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	✗ non	discussion (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	✗ non	discussion (2)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	✗ non	discussion (3)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	✗ non	discussion (5)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	✗ non	discussion (1)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	✗ non	discussion (5)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	✗ non	discussion (1)