Структурирование · What would be true of a public transport system that served its most vulnerable

ВОПРОС

What would be true of a public transport system that served its most vulnerable users well?

Поможет ли одно достичь другого? Решают три четверти поданных голосов.

Вы смотрите как гость. Введите имя пользователя, чтобы присоединиться и участвовать.

Вопросы распределяются между группами, поэтому вы получаете те, что достались вашей группе, — а не все 90.

почему

Никто не смог бы ответить на несколько сотен пар. Каждая пара достается одной группе; пара, по которой мнения разделились, затем передается другим группам, поэтому она может позже появиться в вашем списке, хотя началась в другом месте. Число решенных включает работу всех групп, поэтому оно растет быстрее, чем сокращается ваш список.

решено: 9 / 90 ждут вашего ответа: 0 спорно: 2 (отложено, видно)

Последний подсчет: решено: 7 · передано панелям из нескольких групп: 0 · спорно: 2 · ниже кворума: 81 — панелям нужно не меньше max(2, 75% панели) поданных голосов; в вашей самой маленькой панели 12 участников.

закрыть ✕

The buses would show up when they say they will. → влияет на? → The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.

I've waited for buses that never came, so I know 'showing up when they say' isn't something I can rely on, but that doesn't change what the model says.

Этап завершен — запись пар и голосов приведена выше.Проверить логику ↗

The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	⚑ спорно	обсуждение (5)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	⚑ спорно	обсуждение (3)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	открыто	обсуждение (8)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	открыто	в фокусе ↑ · закрыть ✕
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	открыто	обсуждение (3)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	открыто	обсуждение (6)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	открыто	обсуждение (3)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	открыто	обсуждение (1)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	открыто	обсуждение (7)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	открыто	обсуждение (8)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	открыто	обсуждение (3)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	открыто	обсуждение (8)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	открыто	обсуждение (7)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	открыто	обсуждение (7)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	открыто	обсуждение (3)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	открыто	обсуждение (1)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	открыто	обсуждение (3)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	открыто	обсуждение (7)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	открыто	обсуждение (6)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	открыто	обсуждение (8)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	открыто	обсудить
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	открыто	обсуждение (7)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	открыто	обсуждение (1)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	открыто	обсуждение (8)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	открыто	обсуждение (6)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	открыто	обсуждение (1)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	открыто	обсуждение (7)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	открыто	обсуждение (6)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	открыто	обсуждение (3)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	открыто	обсуждение (3)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	открыто	обсуждение (3)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	открыто	обсуждение (6)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	открыто	обсуждение (3)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	открыто	обсуждение (7)
The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	открыто	обсуждение (3)
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	открыто	обсуждение (8)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	открыто	обсуждение (4)
The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	→	The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	открыто	обсуждение (1)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.	открыто	обсуждение (2)
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	открыто	обсуждение (3)
The routes with the worst delay rates in my models would not be the ones through low-income areas.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	открыто	обсуждение (7)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The lines vulnerable riders rely on would show fewer delays in my models, but I know the data is biased.	открыто	обсуждение (5)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The buses would show up when they say they will.	✗ нет	обсуждение (5)
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	✗ нет	обсуждение (2)
The buses would show up when they say they will.	→	The capital plan would have a separate, fully funded "accessibility backlog" line item, not just reallocated from fleet purchases.	✗ нет	обсуждение (3)
The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	✗ нет	обсуждение (5)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The system would have enough accessible vehicles on every route, every hour, so no one waits for one that might not come.	✗ нет	обсуждение (1)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	The bus would be on time, every time, and quiet enough for my son.	✗ нет	обсуждение (5)
Drivers would know my son is nonverbal and not demand he speak or answer them.	→	When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.	✗ нет	обсуждение (1)