SORU
Why does the same outage keep recurring?
Biri diğerini önemli ölçüde etkiler mi? Kullanılan oyların dörtte üçü karar verir.
kapandı · geri dön: Eylemler
Misafir olarak görüntülüyorsunuz. Katılmak için bir kullanıcı adı girin.
Sorular gruplar arasında paylaştırılır; bu yüzden sorulardan (180) hepsini değil, grubunuza verilenleri alırsınız.
176 / 180 karara bağlandı yanıtlamanız gereken: 0 neden
Kimse birkaç yüz çifti yanıtlayamaz. Her çift bir gruba gider; bölünen bir çift sonra diğer gruplara yönlendirilir, bu yüzden başka yerde başlamış olsa bile daha sonra listenizde görünebilir. Karara bağlananların sayısı her grubun çalışmasını içerir; bu yüzden kendi listenizin kısalmasından daha hızlı artar.
Son sayım: 176 karara bağlandı · 1 gruplar arası panellere aktarıldı · 0 tartışmalı · 3 yeter sayının altında — panellerde en az max(2, panelin %75’i) oy kullanılmalıdır; en küçük panelinizdeki üye sayısı: 15.
Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live → etkiler mi? → …
Henüz bir şey söylenmedi.
Tamamlanmış aşama — çiftlerin ve oyların kaydı yukarıda duruyor.Mantığı denetle ↗
| Reliability has no budget line of its own | → | Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | açık | tartış |
| The same three services cause most of the pages | → | … | açık | tartış |
| The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | → | The service map in the wiki is two years old | açık | tartış |
| The staging environment does not resemble production | → | Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | açık aktarıldı | tartış |
| Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | → | Customers report outages before monitoring does | ✓ evet | tartış |
| Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | → | Customers report outages before monitoring does | ✓ evet | tartış |
| Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | → | Every team has its own logging format | ✓ evet | tartış |
| Every team has its own logging format | → | Customers report outages before monitoring does | ✓ evet | tartış |
| The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | → | Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | ✓ evet | tartış |
| Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | → | Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | ✓ evet | tartış |
| One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | → | The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | ✓ evet | tartış |
| The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | → | Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | ✓ evet | tartış |
| Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | → | Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | ✓ evet | tartış |
| The service map in the wiki is two years old | → | The staging environment does not resemble production | ✓ evet | tartış |
| Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | → | Reliability has no budget line of its own | ✓ evet | tartış |
| Reliability has no budget line of its own | → | The staging environment does not resemble production | ✓ evet | tartış |
| Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | → | The same three services cause most of the pages | ✓ evet | tartış |
| Reliability has no budget line of its own | → | The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | ✓ evet | tartış |
| The same three services cause most of the pages | → | The staging environment does not resemble production | ✓ evet | tartış |
| The service map in the wiki is two years old | → | Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | ✓ evet | tartış |
| Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | → | Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | ✓ evet | tartış |
| Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | → | The same three services cause most of the pages | ✓ evet | tartış |
| The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | → | Customers report outages before monitoring does | ✓ çıkarsandı | tartış |
| Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | → | The staging environment does not resemble production | ✓ çıkarsandı | tartış |
| Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | → | Every team has its own logging format | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Every team has its own logging format | → | Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | → | Customers report outages before monitoring does | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | → | Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | → | One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | → | Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Customers report outages before monitoring does | → | Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | → | Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | → | Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | → | Customers report outages before monitoring does | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Customers report outages before monitoring does | → | The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | → | Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | → | Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | → | The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | → | The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | → | Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | → | Every team has its own logging format | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | → | Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | → | Every team has its own logging format | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | → | Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | → | Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | → | Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | → | One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Customers report outages before monitoring does | → | One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | → | Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | → | The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | → | Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Customers report outages before monitoring does | → | Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | → | The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | → | Every team has its own logging format | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Customers report outages before monitoring does | → | Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Customers report outages before monitoring does | → | Every team has its own logging format | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Customers report outages before monitoring does | → | Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | → | One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Customers report outages before monitoring does | → | Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Every team has its own logging format | → | The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Every team has its own logging format | → | Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Every team has its own logging format | → | Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | → | Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | → | Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | → | The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | → | Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | → | Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | → | Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Customers report outages before monitoring does | → | Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | → | Customers report outages before monitoring does | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | → | Customers report outages before monitoring does | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | → | Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | → | Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | → | Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | → | One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | → | One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | → | Every team has its own logging format | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | → | Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Every team has its own logging format | → | One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | → | Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | → | Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Every team has its own logging format | → | Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | → | Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | → | Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | → | Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | → | Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | → | Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | → | Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | → | Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | → | Every team has its own logging format | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | → | Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | → | Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | → | Customers report outages before monitoring does | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Every team has its own logging format | → | Tests that fail intermittently are retried until green | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | → | Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | → | One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Every team has its own logging format | → | Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | → | Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | → | Error budgets exist on a slide and nowhere else | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortems assign actions to people who were not in the room | → | One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Alerts fire so often that on-call mutes them | → | Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| One engineer knows how the payment path actually works | → | Every team has its own logging format | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | → | The on-call rota has the same two people on it most weeks | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Post-mortem actions are written up and then never scheduled | → | Feature work always outranks reliability work in planning | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The same three services cause most of the pages | → | The service map in the wiki is two years old | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | → | The same three services cause most of the pages | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Config lives in five places and drifts between them | → | Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| … | → | The staging environment does not resemble production | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | → | Config lives in five places and drifts between them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Reliability has no budget line of its own | → | Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | → | Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The same three services cause most of the pages | → | The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The service map in the wiki is two years old | → | Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Config lives in five places and drifts between them | → | Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | → | Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | → | The service map in the wiki is two years old | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| … | → | Reliability has no budget line of its own | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The service map in the wiki is two years old | → | Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | → | Reliability has no budget line of its own | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | → | The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | → | … | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | → | Reliability has no budget line of its own | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Config lives in five places and drifts between them | → | The staging environment does not resemble production | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| … | → | Config lives in five places and drifts between them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | → | … | ✗ hayır | odakta ↑ · kapat ✕ |
| Reliability has no budget line of its own | → | Config lives in five places and drifts between them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | → | Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | → | The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The same three services cause most of the pages | → | Reliability has no budget line of its own | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| … | → | Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | → | The service map in the wiki is two years old | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Config lives in five places and drifts between them | → | Reliability has no budget line of its own | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The staging environment does not resemble production | → | Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | → | Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | → | Config lives in five places and drifts between them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The service map in the wiki is two years old | → | Reliability has no budget line of its own | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The service map in the wiki is two years old | → | Config lives in five places and drifts between them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The staging environment does not resemble production | → | Config lives in five places and drifts between them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | → | The service map in the wiki is two years old | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The staging environment does not resemble production | → | The service map in the wiki is two years old | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The staging environment does not resemble production | → | Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| … | → | The same three services cause most of the pages | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | → | Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| … | → | The service map in the wiki is two years old | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Config lives in five places and drifts between them | → | Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The staging environment does not resemble production | → | … | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Reliability has no budget line of its own | → | … | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The same three services cause most of the pages | → | Config lives in five places and drifts between them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| … | → | The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | → | The staging environment does not resemble production | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | → | The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Config lives in five places and drifts between them | → | … | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The staging environment does not resemble production | → | The same three services cause most of the pages | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Reliability has no budget line of its own | → | Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Config lives in five places and drifts between them | → | The same three services cause most of the pages | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The staging environment does not resemble production | → | The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | → | The staging environment does not resemble production | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| … | → | Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Config lives in five places and drifts between them | → | The service map in the wiki is two years old | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The same three services cause most of the pages | → | Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | → | Config lives in five places and drifts between them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Reliability has no budget line of its own | → | The service map in the wiki is two years old | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | → | … | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | → | Config lives in five places and drifts between them | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Config lives in five places and drifts between them | → | The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | → | Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The service map in the wiki is two years old | → | … | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | → | The same three services cause most of the pages | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | → | Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Reliability has no budget line of its own | → | The same three services cause most of the pages | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | → | Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The same three services cause most of the pages | → | Feature flags are never cleaned up, so nobody knows which paths are live | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The service map in the wiki is two years old | → | The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The service map in the wiki is two years old | → | The same three services cause most of the pages | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | → | … | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The staging environment does not resemble production | → | Reliability has no budget line of its own | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The incident channel fills with people asking for status instead of giving it | → | The staging environment does not resemble production | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| The same three services cause most of the pages | → | Rollbacks take longer than the outage they are meant to end | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| … | → | Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | ✗ hayır | tartış |
| Retries are unbounded, so a slow dependency becomes a flood | → | Reliability has no budget line of its own | ✗ hayır | tartış |