Peta · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

Setiap ruang untuk pertanyaan ini membangun petanya sendiri; semuanya digabung menjadi satu. Klaim yang sama dari dua ruang adalah satu butir, dan setiap kaitan menunjukkan berapa ruang yang menemukannya. Bila ruang-ruang menemukan hal yang berlawanan, setiap temuan tetap berlaku, beserta berapa banyak ruang yang menilai kaitan itu yang menemukannya.

1 kaitan ditemukan oleh beberapa ruang · 0 diperdebatkan · total 53 kaitan.

ditemukan oleh dua ruang independen atau lebih satu ruang ruang lain setuju dengan kata-katanya sendiri, atau lewat sebuah jalur hanya ruang yang tidak dihitung ditolak oleh sebagian besar ruang yang menilainya perselisihan antarruang

Di sudut sebuah klaim, satu figur untuk setiap ruang yang mengangkatnya; lewat dari lima, satu kelompok dengan angkanya. Jika keterangan tidak menyisakan tempat untuk figur, angkanya saja (×7).

Di bawah sebuah sebab: di berapa banyak ruang yang menilai tindakan terhadapnya salah satu tindakan mereka menguranginya. Hijau: setidaknya satu ruang menemukan tindakan seperti itu; abu-abu: tidak ada; tanpa warna: tidak ada ruang yang menilai tindakan terhadapnya. Angka-angkanya adalah tindakan-tindakan itu, tercantum di bawah peta.

Bagikan tampilan ini: sebagai gambar · sebagai peta langsung untuk situs lain

RUANG-RUANG DALAM PETA INI

⚠ Semua 3 ruang: demo · up to 4 cards word for word the same as in 2 other rooms here

Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

demo · stands 1 vouch from its source, trusted steward _5a2886a785

dihitung putusannya berpengaruh pada peta ini — vouched for by the steward of “Why does a lie travel further than the truth?”

Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

dihitung putusannya berpengaruh pada peta ini — steward trusted by this instance

Why does a lie travel further than the truth?

dihitung putusannya berpengaruh pada peta ini — steward trusted by this instance

Sebuah ruang dihitung begitu ada seseorang yang bertanggung jawab mendukungnya. ● tuntas sebelum ada peta yang dipublikasikan; ○ sesudahnya.

DIANGKAT DI LEBIH DARI SATU RUANG · 4

A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	3 ruang	di peta
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	3 ruang	di peta
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	3 ruang	di peta
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	3 ruang	di peta

APA YANG AKAN DILAKUKAN RUANG-RUANG

Setiap ruang menilai tindakannya sendiri terhadap akar penyebabnya sendiri, dengan tiga perempat suaranya sendiri. Tidak ada di sini yang merupakan pemungutan suara lintas ruang: ini menghitung, penyebab demi penyebab, apa yang ditemukan setiap ruang. Sebuah ruang muncul setelah tahap Tindakan di ruang itu ditutup. Setiap nomor di peta menandai akar penyebab yang dikurangi oleh tindakan itu.

Dikurangi di 1 dari 1 ruang:

A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field

① Check processes, not only claims, and fund that separately · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest

② Publish the confidence and the range with every statement, always · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

③ A standing review date on every piece of guidance, published in advance · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

④ A red team paid to argue the guidance is wrong, reporting separately · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour

① Check processes, not only claims, and fund that separately · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric

⑤ Publish who funds each check, on the check · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along

⑥ Data released with the claim, or the claim carries a warning · Why does a lie travel further than the truth?

Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it

② Publish the confidence and the range with every statement, always · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported

② Publish the confidence and the range with every statement, always · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

③ A standing review date on every piece of guidance, published in advance · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

④ A red team paid to argue the guidance is wrong, reporting separately · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes

⑦ Fund replication as a standing line, not a project · Why does a lie travel further than the truth?

Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline

⑧ A public register of every official claim and every later revision · Why does a lie travel further than the truth?

⑦ Fund replication as a standing line, not a project · Why does a lie travel further than the truth?

Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days

③ A standing review date on every piece of guidance, published in advance · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association

⑧ A public register of every official claim and every later revision · Why does a lie travel further than the truth?

Tidak ada ruang yang menemukan tindakan yang mengurangi ini:

A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not · dinilai di 1 ruang
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing · dinilai di 1 ruang
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs · dinilai di 1 ruang
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim · dinilai di 1 ruang
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public · dinilai di 1 ruang
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them · dinilai di 1 ruang
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence · dinilai di 1 ruang

DITEMUKAN OLEH 2 RUANG · 1

Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow

→

A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed

DITEMUKAN OLEH 1 RUANG · 52

We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence
	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported
	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim
	→	The metric is claims processed
Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along	→	A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder
	→	The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public
	→	A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined
	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly
Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline	→	A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder
	→	The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public
	→	A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old
	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an intere	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old
	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the c	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revis	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported
Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence cha	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news
	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'
	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public	→	Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	⇄	The metric is claims processed
	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not
	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical
	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it
	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing	→	A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance
	→	There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early
The metric is claims processed	⇄	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported
A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance	→	So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early	→	So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed
	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all

apa yang dilakukan mengenai ini →

Ruang-ruang berbeda (2)

Sebagian ruang yang menilai ini menemukan tautannya dan yang lain tidak. Temuan setiap ruang tetap berlaku dan digambar dengan jumlahnya: sebuah penyebab bisa berlaku di satu tempat dan tidak di tempat lain.

The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it → A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed ditemukan di sebagian ruang yang menilainya (1 dari 3)

Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported → A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed ditemukan di sebagian ruang yang menilainya (1 dari 2)