Strukturering · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

SPØRSMÅLET

Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

Påvirker det ene det andre i betydelig grad? Tre firedeler av de avgitte stemmene avgjør.

Du ser på som gjest. Skriv inn et brukernavn for å bli med og delta.

Spørsmålene fordeles mellom gruppene, så du får dem gruppen din ble tildelt — ikke alle 180.

hvorfor

Ingen kunne svart på flere hundre par. Hvert par går til én gruppe; et par som deler gruppen, sendes så videre til andre grupper, så det kan dukke opp i listen din senere selv om det startet et annet sted. Antallet avgjorte omfatter alle gruppenes arbeid, og derfor stiger det raskere enn din egen liste krymper.

avgjort: 177 / 180 til deg å svare på: 0

Siste opptelling: avgjort 177 · sendt videre til paneler på tvers av grupper 0 · omstridt 0 · under kvorum 3 — paneler trenger minst max(2, 75% av panelet) avgitte stemmer; ditt minste panel har 15 medlemmer.

lukk ✕

A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not → påvirker? → Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides

Ingenting sagt ennå.

Fullført fase — protokollen over par og stemmer står ovenfor.Sjekk logikken ↗

A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	åpent	diskuter
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	åpent	diskuter
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	åpent	diskuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ ja	diskuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✓ ja	diskuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✓ ja	diskuter
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✓ ja	diskuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✓ ja	diskuter
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ ja	diskuter
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ ja	diskuter
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✓ ja	diskuter
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ ja	diskuter
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ ja	diskuter
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✓ ja	diskuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✓ ja	diskuter
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✓ utledet	diskuter
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✓ utledet	diskuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ nei	diskuter
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ nei	diskuter
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ nei	diskuter
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ nei	diskuter
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ nei	diskuter
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nei	diskuter
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nei	diskuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nei	diskuter
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ nei	diskuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ nei	diskuter
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ nei	diskuter
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nei	diskuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nei	diskuter
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nei	diskuter
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ nei	diskuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ nei	diskuter
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nei	diskuter
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ nei	diskuter
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ nei	i fokus ↑ · lukk ✕
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ nei	diskuter
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ nei	diskuter
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ nei	diskuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ nei	diskuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nei	diskuter
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nei	diskuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ nei	diskuter
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nei	diskuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nei	diskuter
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ nei	diskuter
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ nei	diskuter
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ nei	diskuter
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ nei	diskuter
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ nei	diskuter
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ nei	diskuter
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ nei	diskuter
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ nei	diskuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ nei	diskuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ nei	diskuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ nei	diskuter
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ nei	diskuter
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ nei	diskuter
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ nei	diskuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ nei	diskuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nei	diskuter
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ nei	diskuter
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nei	diskuter
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nei	diskuter
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nei	diskuter
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ nei	diskuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ nei	diskuter
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nei	diskuter
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nei	diskuter
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ nei	diskuter
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ nei	diskuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ nei	diskuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ nei	diskuter
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ nei	diskuter
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nei	diskuter
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ nei	diskuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ nei	diskuter
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nei	diskuter
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ nei	diskuter
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nei	diskuter
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ nei	diskuter
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ nei	diskuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ nei	diskuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ nei	diskuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nei	diskuter
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nei	diskuter
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ nei	diskuter
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ nei	diskuter
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ nei	diskuter
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ nei	diskuter
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ nei	diskuter
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ nei	diskuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ nei	diskuter
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ nei	diskuter
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ nei	diskuter
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ nei	diskuter
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ nei	diskuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ nei	diskuter
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ nei	diskuter
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ nei	diskuter
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ nei	diskuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ nei	diskuter
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ nei	diskuter
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ nei	diskuter
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ nei	diskuter
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ nei	diskuter
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ nei	diskuter
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ nei	diskuter
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ nei	diskuter
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ nei	diskuter
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ nei	diskuter
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ nei	diskuter
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ nei	diskuter
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ nei	diskuter
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ nei	diskuter
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ nei	diskuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ nei	diskuter
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ nei	diskuter
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ nei	diskuter
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ nei	diskuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ nei	diskuter
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ nei	diskuter
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ nei	diskuter
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ nei	diskuter
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ nei	diskuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ nei	diskuter
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ nei	diskuter
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ nei	diskuter
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ nei	diskuter
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ nei	diskuter
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ nei	diskuter
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ nei	diskuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ nei	diskuter
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ nei	diskuter
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ nei	diskuter
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ nei	diskuter
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ nei	diskuter
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ nei	diskuter
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ nei	diskuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ nei	diskuter