True Causes
← lobby
Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?
tap any completed stage to explore it
Generate
Clarify
Cluster
Select
Structure
Map
7
Actions
walkthrough · not counted
anyone with the link · listed publicly · federation on
30 people · 39 ideas · 2 groups · 3 rooms federated
Logic → · record
THE QUESTION

Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

Group cards you judge alike. Groups organise reading; they decide nothing.

closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
Clusters form from similarity, names come last
Canonical order: link pairs of ideas you judge similar — links are symmetric (A~B is B~A; direction never matters) and a tie holds once 2 members make it.
why
Links are symmetric — A~B is B~A. Clusters are the groups that emerge from held ties, and only a formed cluster can be named, by a person. Your own links carry a ✕ to withdraw; you cannot remove someone else's. Clusters organise the wall and never gate the vote — two cards making the same CLAIM are a merge back in Clarify.
Links and names are made while Cluster is live; the steward’s ← reopens it.
close ✕
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it
Nothing said yet.
unnamed cluster — name it if the group has a common thread, or leave it unnamed (2)
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly
~ Independence is asser… · held~ Being wrong in public… · helddiscuss
Independence is asserted rather than structurally arranged
~ So the incentive is t… · helddiscuss
unnamed cluster — name it if the group has a common thread, or leave it unnamed (2)
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
~ Guidance was stated m… · held~ So the incentive is t… · helddiscuss
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported
~ Reversing guidance is… · held~ Being wrong in public… · held~ Nobody is assigned to… · helddiscuss
unnamed cluster — name it if the group has a common thread, or leave it unnamed (2)
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest
~ Declaring an interest… · helddiscuss
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one
~ Anyone with relevant … · helddiscuss
unnamed cluster — name it if the group has a common thread, or leave it unnamed (2)
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it
~ An error admitted ear… · helddiscuss
An error admitted early would have cost far less than one admitted late
~ Emergency powers susp… · helddiscuss
· not yet clustered (31)
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice
~ Nobody is assigned to… · helddiscussing (1)
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed
The team that wrote the guidance reviews the guidance
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it
Political timelines and evidence timelines are different lengths
The evidence base is built from studies designed by interested parties
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides
Committee members are chosen partly for being unlikely to make trouble
The press asks for a number and prints the number without the range
A hedged message is reported as no message at all
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it
The models were right about direction and wrong about magnitude, and only magnitude was reported
~ Nobody is assigned to… · helddiscuss
Preprints move faster than review and are quoted as settled
An advisory committee's dissent is recorded and not published
A negative result is not publishable, so the record is skewed
Nobody outside can reproduce the analysis that produced the number
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline
Saying 'we do not know yet' is heard as incompetence
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong
~ The models were right… · held~ Guidance was stated m… · held~ Advice must be given … · helddiscuss
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not
A fact-checker who contradicts a funder does not get renewed
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie
~ Guidance was stated m… · helddiscuss
The same handful of experts sit on every committee
Journals gain nothing from publishing a correction
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined
Fact-checking grants come from the bodies whose claims are checked
Data behind the guidance is not released with it
Nobody funds the checking of the checkers
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days