Yapılandırma · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

SORU

Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

Biri diğerini önemli ölçüde etkiler mi? Kullanılan oyların dörtte üçü karar verir.

Misafir olarak görüntülüyorsunuz. Katılmak için bir kullanıcı adı girin.

Sorular gruplar arasında paylaştırılır; bu yüzden sorulardan (180) hepsini değil, grubunuza verilenleri alırsınız.

neden

Kimse birkaç yüz çifti yanıtlayamaz. Her çift bir gruba gider; bölünen bir çift sonra diğer gruplara yönlendirilir, bu yüzden başka yerde başlamış olsa bile daha sonra listenizde görünebilir. Karara bağlananların sayısı her grubun çalışmasını içerir; bu yüzden kendi listenizin kısalmasından daha hızlı artar.

177 / 180 karara bağlandı yanıtlamanız gereken: 0

Son sayım: 177 karara bağlandı · 0 gruplar arası panellere aktarıldı · 0 tartışmalı · 3 yeter sayının altında — panellerde en az max(2, panelin %75’i) oy kullanılmalıdır; en küçük panelinizdeki üye sayısı: 15.

kapat ✕

A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed → etkiler mi? → Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides

Henüz bir şey söylenmedi.

Tamamlanmış aşama — çiftlerin ve oyların kaydı yukarıda duruyor.Mantığı denetle ↗

A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	açık	tartış
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	açık	tartış
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	açık	tartış
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ evet	tartış
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✓ evet	tartış
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✓ evet	tartış
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✓ evet	tartış
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✓ evet	tartış
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ evet	tartış
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ evet	tartış
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✓ evet	tartış
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ evet	tartış
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ evet	tartış
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✓ evet	tartış
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✓ evet	tartış
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✓ çıkarsandı	tartış
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✓ çıkarsandı	tartış
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ hayır	tartış
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ hayır	tartış
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ hayır	tartış
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ hayır	tartış
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ hayır	tartış
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ hayır	tartış
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ hayır	tartış
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ hayır	tartış
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ hayır	tartış
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ hayır	tartış
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ hayır	tartış
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ hayır	tartış
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ hayır	tartış
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ hayır	tartış
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ hayır	tartış
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ hayır	tartış
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ hayır	tartış
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ hayır	tartış
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ hayır	tartış
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ hayır	tartış
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ hayır	tartış
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ hayır	tartış
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ hayır	tartış
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ hayır	tartış
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ hayır	tartış
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ hayır	tartış
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ hayır	tartış
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ hayır	tartış
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ hayır	tartış
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ hayır	tartış
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ hayır	tartış
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ hayır	tartış
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ hayır	tartış
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ hayır	tartış
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ hayır	tartış
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ hayır	odakta ↑ · kapat ✕
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ hayır	tartış
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ hayır	tartış
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ hayır	tartış
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ hayır	tartış
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ hayır	tartış
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ hayır	tartış
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ hayır	tartış
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ hayır	tartış
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ hayır	tartış
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ hayır	tartış
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ hayır	tartış
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ hayır	tartış
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ hayır	tartış
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ hayır	tartış
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ hayır	tartış
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ hayır	tartış
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ hayır	tartış
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ hayır	tartış
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ hayır	tartış
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ hayır	tartış
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ hayır	tartış
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ hayır	tartış
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ hayır	tartış
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ hayır	tartış
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ hayır	tartış
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ hayır	tartış
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ hayır	tartış
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ hayır	tartış
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ hayır	tartış
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ hayır	tartış
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ hayır	tartış
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ hayır	tartış
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ hayır	tartış
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ hayır	tartış
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ hayır	tartış
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ hayır	tartış
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ hayır	tartış
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ hayır	tartış
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ hayır	tartış
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	…	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	…	✗ hayır	tartış
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	…	✗ hayır	tartış
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ hayır	tartış
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ hayır	tartış
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ hayır	tartış
…	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ hayır	tartış
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ hayır	tartış
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ hayır	tartış
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ hayır	tartış
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ hayır	tartış
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ hayır	tartış
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ hayır	tartış
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ hayır	tartış
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ hayır	tartış
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ hayır	tartış
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ hayır	tartış
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ hayır	tartış
…	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ hayır	tartış
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ hayır	tartış
…	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ hayır	tartış
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ hayır	tartış
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ hayır	tartış
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	…	✗ hayır	tartış
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	…	✗ hayır	tartış
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ hayır	tartış
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ hayır	tartış
…	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ hayır	tartış
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ hayır	tartış
…	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ hayır	tartış
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	…	✗ hayır	tartış
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ hayır	tartış
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ hayır	tartış
…	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ hayır	tartış
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ hayır	tartış
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ hayır	tartış
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ hayır	tartış
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ hayır	tartış
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ hayır	tartış
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ hayır	tartış
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ hayır	tartış
…	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ hayır	tartış
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ hayır	tartış
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ hayır	tartış
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ hayır	tartış
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ hayır	tartış
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ hayır	tartış
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ hayır	tartış
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ hayır	tartış
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ hayır	tartış
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ hayır	tartış
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	…	✗ hayır	tartış
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ hayır	tartış
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ hayır	tartış
…	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ hayır	tartış
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ hayır	tartış
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ hayır	tartış
…	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ hayır	tartış
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ hayır	tartış
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ hayır	tartış
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ hayır	tartış
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ hayır	tartış
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ hayır	tartış
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ hayır	tartış
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ hayır	tartış
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ hayır	tartış
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ hayır	tartış
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ hayır	tartış
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ hayır	tartış
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	…	✗ hayır	tartış
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ hayır	tartış
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	…	✗ hayır	tartış
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ hayır	tartış