True Causes
ES
← vestíbulo
7/7 · Acciones · viendo Selección
personas: 30 · ideas: 39
demostración · no cuenta
obstáculos · cualquier persona con el enlace · listado públicamente · federación activada
coordinada por su coordinador (sellada)
personas: 30 · ideas: 39 · 2 grupos · 3 salas federada
Pasaporte → · Lógica → · registro
↗ compartir este mapa
En otro sitio, como mapa en vivo:
Como imagen: https://truecauses.org/d/71b90d0/map.svg
Como datos: todos los pares juzgados en esta sala (CSV). Cada afirmación tiene su propia dirección, /c/71b90d0/<card>, listada bajo el mapa.
Cita al publicar: Causal map: True Causes, https://truecauses.org/d/71b90d0
LA PREGUNTA

Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

Gasta tus adhesivos en lo que más importa. Una idea con pruebas puede ocupar una plaza reservada.

Viendo como invitado. Escribe un nombre de usuario para unirte y participar.
Tus adhesivos
Uno por idea, 5 en total. El mínimo es un voto.
Hay plazas reservadas para ideas pasadas por alto (5) — nomina una con un enlace, y cuenta en cuanto 2 personas estén de acuerdo en que la fuente es pertinente.
por qué
Al cerrar la etapa, una nominada entra por sorteo y el resto por número de nominaciones, como máximo una por clase de participante. Un modelo solo comprueba si la página trata del mismo tema — nunca si prueba la afirmación. Ese juicio corresponde a la sala, y una nominación que nadie más respalda no obtiene plaza.
cerrar ✕
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed
también se discutió durante · Aclaración (1) · Estructuración (1)
Nadie ha dicho nada aún.
CONJUNTO 1
Independence is asserted rather than structurally arranged
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
votos: 4discutir
CONJUNTO 2
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest
votos: 1discutir
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
votos: 3discutir
CONJUNTO 3
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
votos: 13discutir
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported
votos: 15discutir
CONJUNTO 4
An error admitted early would have cost far less than one admitted late
votos: 0discutir
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it
votos: 2discutir
SIN CONJUNTO
Fact-checking grants come from the bodies whose claims are checked
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
votos: 0discutir
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year
votos: 6discutir
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not
votos: 1discutir
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong
votos: 10
↳ nominada para una plaza: https://example.org/ops-incident-review.pdf could not read it (HTTPError) la respaldan 1 de 2
discutir
An advisory committee's dissent is recorded and not published
votos: 0discutir
A negative result is not publishable, so the record is skewed
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
votos: 0discutir
Data behind the guidance is not released with it
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
votos: 0discutir
Saying 'we do not know yet' is heard as incompetence
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
votos: 0discutir
A fact-checker who contradicts a funder does not get renewed
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
votos: 0discutir
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice
votos: 4discutir
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed
Nobody funds the checking of the checkers
votos: 0discutir
Committee members are chosen partly for being unlikely to make trouble
votos: 0discutir
The press asks for a number and prints the number without the range
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
votos: 0discutir
Political timelines and evidence timelines are different lengths
votos: 0discutir
The evidence base is built from studies designed by interested parties
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
votos: 0discutir
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
votos: 9discutir
Nobody outside can reproduce the analysis that produced the number
votos: 0discutir
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline
votos: 2discutir
The same handful of experts sit on every committee
votos: 0discutir
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
votos: 14discutir
Journals gain nothing from publishing a correction
votos: 0discutir
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
votos: 14discutir
A hedged message is reported as no message at all
votos: 0discutir
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it
votos: 14discutir
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides
votos: 7discutir
The models were right about direction and wrong about magnitude, and only magnitude was reported
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
votos: 0discutir
Preprints move faster than review and are quoted as settled
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
votos: 0discutir
The team that wrote the guidance reviews the guidance
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
votos: 0discutir
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it
votos: 7discutir