問い
Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?
一方は他方に大きく影響しますか？投じられた票の4分の3で決まります。
終了 · 対策に戻る
ゲストとして閲覧中。参加するにはユーザー名を入力してください。
問いはグループに分配されるので、あなたに届くのは自分のグループに割り当てられたものだけです（全180件ではありません）。
決着 177/180 あなたの回答待ち：0 理由
数百ものペアに答えられる人はいません。各ペアは一つのグループに渡され、意見が割れたペアは他のグループに回されます。そのため、別のところで始まったペアが後からあなたの一覧に現れることがあります。決着の数にはすべてのグループの作業が含まれるので、自分の一覧が減るより速く増えていきます。
前回の集計：決着 177 · グループ横断パネルへ回付 0 · 争いあり 0 · 定足数未満 3 — パネルには max(2, パネルの75%) 以上の票が必要です。最小のパネルのメンバーは15人です.
完了した段階です。ペアと投票の記録は上にあります。論理を確かめる ↗
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | 未決 | 議論する |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | 未決 | 議論する |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | 未決 | 議論する |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✓ はい | 議論する |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✓ 推論 | 議論する |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✓ 推論 | 議論する |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | … | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | … | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | … | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| … | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| … | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| … | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | … | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | … | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| … | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| … | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | … | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| … | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| … | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ いいえ | 表示中 ↑ · 閉じる ✕ |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | … | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| … | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| … | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | … | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | … | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |