LA PREGUNTA
Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?
¿Influye una significativamente en la otra? Deciden tres cuartas partes de los votos emitidos.
cerrada · volver a Acciones
Viendo como invitado. Escribe un nombre de usuario para unirte y participar.
Las preguntas se reparten entre los grupos, así que recibes las que le tocaron al tuyo — no las 180.
resueltas: 177 / 180 por responder: 0 por qué
Nadie podría responder varios cientos de pares. Cada par va a un grupo; un par que se divide se deriva después a otros grupos, así que puede aparecer más tarde en tu lista aunque empezara en otro sitio. La cifra de resueltas incluye el trabajo de todos los grupos, y por eso sube más rápido de lo que se acorta tu propia lista.
Último recuento: decididas: 177 · derivadas a paneles entre grupos: 0 · disputadas: 0 · sin quórum: 3 — los paneles necesitan al menos max(2, 75 % del panel) votos emitidos; tu panel más pequeño tiene 15 miembros.
… → ¿influye en? → There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined
Nadie ha dicho nada aún.
Fase terminada — el registro de pares y votos queda arriba.Comprobar la lógica ↗
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | abierto | discutir |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | abierto | discutir |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | abierto | discutir |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✓ sí | discutir |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✓ sí | discutir |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✓ inferido | discutir |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✓ inferido | discutir |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ no | discutir |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ no | discutir |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ no | discutir |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ no | discutir |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ no | discutir |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ no | discutir |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ no | discutir |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ no | discutir |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ no | discutir |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ no | discutir |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ no | discutir |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ no | discutir |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ no | discutir |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ no | discutir |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ no | discutir |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ no | discutir |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ no | discutir |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ no | discutir |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ no | discutir |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ no | discutir |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ no | discutir |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ no | discutir |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ no | discutir |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ no | discutir |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ no | discutir |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ no | discutir |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ no | discutir |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ no | discutir |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ no | discutir |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ no | discutir |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ no | discutir |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ no | discutir |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ no | discutir |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ no | discutir |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ no | discutir |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | ✗ no | discutir |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | ✗ no | discutir |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ no | discutir |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ no | discutir |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ no | discutir |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ no | discutir |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | ✗ no | discutir |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ no | discutir |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ no | discutir |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ no | discutir |
| Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ no | discutir |
| A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | → | Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | ✗ no | discutir |
| The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | → | A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not | ✗ no | discutir |
| Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice | → | Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides | ✗ no | discutir |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ no | discutir |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | … | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | … | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | … | ✗ no | discutir |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ no | discutir |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ no | discutir |
| … | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ no | en foco ↑ · cerrar ✕ |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ no | discutir |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ no | discutir |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ no | discutir |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ no | discutir |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ no | discutir |
| … | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ no | discutir |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ no | discutir |
| … | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ no | discutir |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ no | discutir |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | … | ✗ no | discutir |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | … | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ no | discutir |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ no | discutir |
| … | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ no | discutir |
| … | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ no | discutir |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | … | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ no | discutir |
| … | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ no | discutir |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ no | discutir |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ no | discutir |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ no | discutir |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ no | discutir |
| … | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ no | discutir |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ no | discutir |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ no | discutir |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | … | ✗ no | discutir |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ no | discutir |
| Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ no | discutir |
| … | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ no | discutir |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ no | discutir |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ no | discutir |
| … | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ no | discutir |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ no | discutir |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | ✗ no | discutir |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | ✗ no | discutir |
| Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | → | Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ no | discutir |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days | ✗ no | discutir |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | → | So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | ✗ no | discutir |
| There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year | → | … | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly | → | Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie | ✗ no | discutir |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | … | ✗ no | discutir |
| Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it | → | Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs | ✗ no | discutir |