구조 잡기 · Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

질문

Why do false claims spread faster than corrections?

한쪽이 다른 쪽에 크게 영향을 줍니까? 던진 표의 4분의 3으로 정합니다.

게스트로 보는 중. 참여하려면 닉네임을 입력하세요.

질문은 그룹별로 나뉘어, 내 그룹이 받은 질문만 나옵니다. 전체 180개가 다 나오지는 않습니다.

이유

수백 개의 쌍을 혼자 답할 수는 없습니다. 각 쌍은 한 그룹에 갑니다. 의견이 갈린 쌍은 다른 그룹에 넘어가므로, 다른 곳에서 시작한 쌍이 나중에 내 목록에 나올 수 있습니다. 확정된 수에는 모든 그룹의 작업이 들어가므로, 내 목록이 줄어드는 것보다 빨리 늘어납니다.

확정 177 / 180 내가 답할 질문 0개

지난 집계: 결정 177 · 그룹 간 패널로 넘김 0 · 이견 있음 0 · 최소 인원 미달 3 — 패널마다 던진 표가 최소 max(2, 패널의 75%) 필요합니다. 가장 작은 패널의 멤버는 15명입니다.

닫기 ✕

There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined → 영향을 주나? → Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days

아직 아무 말도 없습니다.

끝난 단계입니다. 쌍과 투표 기록은 위에 있습니다.논리 확인 ↗

A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	미결	논의하기
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	미결	논의하기
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	미결	논의하기
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ 예	논의하기
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✓ 예	논의하기
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✓ 예	논의하기
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✓ 예	논의하기
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✓ 예	논의하기
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ 예	논의하기
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ 예	논의하기
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✓ 예	논의하기
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ 예	논의하기
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ 예	논의하기
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✓ 예	논의하기
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✓ 예	논의하기
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✓ 추론됨	논의하기
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✓ 추론됨	논의하기
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody is assigned to look for evidence that the advice was wrong	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Declaring an interest has replaced avoiding one	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	→	Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The first statement sets the frame and every revision fights it	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	→	A quiet revision looks like concealment even when it is not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Advice must be given before the evidence is complete or it is not advice	→	Officials learned that hedging gets them attacked from both sides	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nuance is stripped between the briefing and the headline	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ 아니요	보는 중 ↑ · 닫기 ✕
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	→	Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Retracting a paper takes years and the claim travels in days	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	→	So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	✗ 아니요	논의하기
There is no routine moment at which guidance is re-examined	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	Anyone with relevant expertise has funding from someone with an interest	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister needs an answer this week and the study reports next year	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the incentive is to revise quietly rather than loudly	→	Reversing guidance is used as proof the whole thing was a lie	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Emergency powers suspend the checks that would have caught it	→	Nobody has ever measured what a late correction costs	✗ 아니요	논의하기