질문
Why do atrocities go unpunished?
비슷하다고 판단한 카드를 묶으세요. 묶음은 읽기 편하게 정리할 뿐, 아무것도 결정하지 않습니다.
닫힘 · 대책 단계로 돌아가기
게스트로 보는 중. 참여하려면 닉네임을 입력하세요.
묶음은 비슷한 것끼리 생기고, 이름은 마지막에 붙입니다
기본 순서: 비슷하다고 판단한 아이디어 쌍을 연결하세요. 연결은 대칭입니다(A~B는 B~A와 같고, 방향은 상관없습니다). 2명이 같은 연결을 하면 연결이 유지됩니다.
이유
연결은 대칭입니다. A~B는 B~A와 같습니다. 묶음은 유지된 연결로 생기는 모임이고, 만들어진 묶음에만 사람이 이름을 붙일 수 있습니다. 내 연결에는 취소할 수 있는 ✕가 붙습니다. 다른 사람의 연결은 지울 수 없습니다. 묶음은 보드를 정리할 뿐 투표를 막지 않습니다. 두 카드가 같은 주장을 한다면 명확히 하기 단계로 돌아가 합쳐야 합니다.
연결과 이름은 묶기 단계가 열려 있을 때 만듭니다. 진행자의 ←로 다시 열 수 있습니다.
· 아직 묶이지 않음 (38)
Access requires the consent of the government doing the harming
A warning that is wrong destroys the credibility of the next one
Nobody is held accountable for a mission that watched
Peacekeepers are deployed with mandates that forbid what is needed
Evidence is gathered for a trial that may happen in fifteen years
Nobody has ever costed prevention against the response that followed
We compete with each other for the same appeal
Lawyers advise against the word for exactly that reason
Naming it triggers obligations, so it is not named
Justice arrives after the society that needed it has gone
Arms sales and atrocity policy sit in different ministries
The people who see it first have no route to those who decide
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished
By the time it is a briefing it is a statistic
Prevention has no budget line anywhere
Staff who witness it are bound by agreements they did not choose
Money arrives when there are bodies, not before
The warnings were unmistakable long before anything was done
Early warning systems produce reports nobody is obliged to answer
A tribunal convicts individuals and leaves the structure intact
Troop-contributing countries veto the risk their soldiers may take
Survivors testify repeatedly and are helped by none of it
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided
Our funding depends on the emergency continuing
The same states arming a party also vote on protecting its victims
Diaspora warnings are dismissed as partisan
Speaking publicly ends the access that lets us feed people
A donor can point at a camp and cannot point at a war that did not start
The threshold for the word 'genocide' is legal, not humanitarian
Each summary removes the part that would require action
Field reports are summarised three times before they reach a capital
Every state judges the case by what it costs them
A mission is judged on casualties among peacekeepers, not among civilians
Local knowledge is treated as bias and distance is treated as objectivity
So the organisation that knows most says least
So warnings are hedged until they are unarguable, which is too late
Local staff take the risk and international staff hold the mandate