LA PREGUNTA
Why do atrocities go unpunished?
Agrupa las tarjetas que consideres parecidas. Los conjuntos ordenan la lectura; no deciden nada.
cerrada · volver a Acciones
Viendo como invitado. Escribe un nombre de usuario para unirte y participar.
Los conjuntos se forman por parecido; los nombres vienen al final
Orden canónico: vincula pares de ideas que consideres parecidas — los vínculos son simétricos (A~B es B~A; la dirección nunca importa) y un vínculo se mantiene en cuanto lo hacen 2 miembros.
por qué
Los vínculos son simétricos — A~B es B~A. Los conjuntos son los grupos que surgen de los vínculos que se mantienen, y solo un conjunto ya formado puede recibir nombre, y lo pone una persona. Tus propios vínculos llevan una ✕ para retirarlos; no puedes quitar los de otra persona. Los conjuntos ordenan el muro y nunca condicionan la votación — dos tarjetas que hacen la misma AFIRMACIÓN se fusionan en la etapa Aclaración.
Los vínculos y los nombres se hacen mientras la etapa Agrupación está abierta; el botón ← del coordinador la reabre.
· aún sin conjunto (38)
Access requires the consent of the government doing the harming
A warning that is wrong destroys the credibility of the next one
Nobody is held accountable for a mission that watched
Peacekeepers are deployed with mandates that forbid what is needed
Evidence is gathered for a trial that may happen in fifteen years
Nobody has ever costed prevention against the response that followed
We compete with each other for the same appeal
Lawyers advise against the word for exactly that reason
Naming it triggers obligations, so it is not named
Justice arrives after the society that needed it has gone
Arms sales and atrocity policy sit in different ministries
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted
By the time it is a briefing it is a statistic
Prevention has no budget line anywhere
Staff who witness it are bound by agreements they did not choose
Money arrives when there are bodies, not before
The warnings were unmistakable long before anything was done
Early warning systems produce reports nobody is obliged to answer
A tribunal convicts individuals and leaves the structure intact
Troop-contributing countries veto the risk their soldiers may take
Survivors testify repeatedly and are helped by none of it
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided
Our funding depends on the emergency continuing
The same states arming a party also vote on protecting its victims
Diaspora warnings are dismissed as partisan
Speaking publicly ends the access that lets us feed people
A donor can point at a camp and cannot point at a war that did not start
The threshold for the word 'genocide' is legal, not humanitarian
Each summary removes the part that would require action
Field reports are summarised three times before they reach a capital
Every state judges the case by what it costs them
A mission is judged on casualties among peacekeepers, not among civilians
Local knowledge is treated as bias and distance is treated as objectivity
So the organisation that knows most says least
So warnings are hedged until they are unarguable, which is too late
Local staff take the risk and international staff hold the mandate