問い
Why is housing unaffordable in our cities?
公開記録のルーム。カードは人々が公開の議論で述べた主張です。それぞれがどこで言われたかは、プールのその主張の下に載っています。 言語モデルのパネルがカードを明確にし、組み合わせを判定しました。このマップは、モデルが世間の声をどう構造化したかであって、人の集団が見いだしたものではありません。 他の公開記録のルームとだけ合算されます。 関連研究：モデルに自分が誰かを告げても、その因果判断はほとんど変わらない。だからこのパネルはペルソナなしに、自分自身として判定します。
公開の議論で主張されたつながり（1）
プールが数えたとおり：誰がつながりを主張し、誰が退けたか。パネルのマップと見比べてください。どちらも集団の評決ではありません。
- Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. → Zoning irresponsibly near heavy transit restricts housing development. 薄い
一方は他方に大きく影響しますか？投じられた票の4分の3で決まります。
終了 · 対策に戻る
ゲストとして閲覧中。参加するにはユーザー名を入力してください。
問いはグループに分配されるので、あなたに届くのは自分のグループに割り当てられたものだけです（全870件ではありません）。
決着 399/870 あなたの回答待ち：0 争いあり：234（保留、表示中） 理由
数百ものペアに答えられる人はいません。各ペアは一つのグループに渡され、意見が割れたペアは他のグループに回されます。そのため、別のところで始まったペアが後からあなたの一覧に現れることがあります。決着の数にはすべてのグループの作業が含まれるので、自分の一覧が減るより速く増えていきます。
前回の集計：決着 165 · グループ横断パネルへ回付 0 · 争いあり 234 · 定足数未満 471 — パネルには max(2, パネルの75%) 以上の票が必要です。最小のパネルのメンバーは20人です.
Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. → 影響する？ → Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities.
まだ発言はありません。
完了した段階です。ペアと投票の記録は上にあります。論理を確かめる ↗
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（4） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（4） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（4） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（5） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（5） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（4） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（4） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（3） |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（2） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論する |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ⚑ 争いあり | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | 未決 | 議論中（3） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論中（3） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論する |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論中（3） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | 未決 | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | 未決 | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | 未決 | 議論中（3） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論する |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | 未決 | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論する |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | 未決 | 議論する |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論する |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論する |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | 未決 | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論する |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論中（3） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論する |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 表示中 ↑ · 閉じる ✕ |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（3） |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（3） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | 未決 | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論する |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | 未決 | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | 未決 | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | 未決 | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論する |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | 未決 | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | 未決 | 議論する |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | 未決 | 議論中（3） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Residents voting may not want to change the system. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（2） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | 未決 | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | 未決 | 議論中（1） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | 未決 | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | 未決 | 議論中（3） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ✓ はい | 議論中（2） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ✓ はい | 議論中（3） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | ✓ はい | 議論中（4） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ✓ はい | 議論中（2） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ✓ はい | 議論中（3） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ✓ はい | 議論中（4） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ✓ はい | 議論中（4） |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ✓ はい | 議論中（4） |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ✓ はい | 議論中（4） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✓ はい | 議論中（3） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ✓ はい | 議論中（4） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ✓ はい | 議論中（1） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ✓ はい | 議論中（3） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ✓ はい | 議論中（3） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ✓ はい | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✓ はい | 議論中（2） |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ✓ はい | 議論中（1） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ✓ はい | 議論中（2） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ✓ はい | 議論中（1） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ✓ はい | 議論中（2） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | ✓ はい | 議論中（3） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ✓ はい | 議論中（2） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ✓ はい | 議論中（2） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ✓ はい | 議論中（3） |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ✓ はい | 議論中（4） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | ✓ はい | 議論中（2） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ✓ はい | 議論中（3） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✓ 推論 | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✓ 推論 | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（2） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（2） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（2） |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（2） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✓ 推論 | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（2） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（1） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✓ 推論 | 議論する |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（1） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（1） |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✓ 推論 | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（1） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（2） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | ✓ 推論 | 議論中（2） |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ✓ 推論 | 議論する |
| Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | → | Residents voting may not want to change the system. | ✓ 推論 | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | ✓ 推論 | 議論する |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（2） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（2） |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Transportation costs offset savings from living further from urban core | → | Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | The reason more isn’t being built is zoning. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Deliberate policy turned homes into speculative assets and locked out a generation. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | New luxury apartments are bought by foreign investors who keep them empty. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | → | YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| NIMBY exists to protect most people's largest financial asset. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| Housing shortages are treated as free money by incumbents. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| YIMBY policies economically pollute areas with an influx of investment | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（2） |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| The city council refuses to allow low cost apartments or assist funding them | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | The previous Government made anti-supply changes to national planning policy. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| More housing units on the market reduces prices. | → | Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | More housing units on the market reduces prices. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| People who work in the city can't afford to live there. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| Companies prefer regional housing crises over investing in second tier cities. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| We are consciously limiting supply in the Seattle housing market. | → | Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| The main reason we don't have infinite housing is regulation. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| There is so much demand and money that prices won't go down. | → | Property rights give owners priority access to land. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Developers have an incentive to keep rents high overall. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Companies concentrate demand for housing in a few areas. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | → | American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | → | Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | There are many under-utilized spaces for new construction in the Bay Area. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| America adds 600k-1.2M immigrants per year, straining limited supply | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Cambridge lowers property tax for owner-occupied homes to incentivize residency. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |
| Housing relies on rising house prices to function in the UK. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| High density development happens without necessary transit investment. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | → | Wallingford will be valuable and therefore expensive no matter what housing is built. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Property rights give owners priority access to land. | → | Local control laws allow anyone to stop development in others' yards. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（2） |
| American life is structured to require a car for transportation. | → | House prices in the UK are high because of low supply and buoyant demand. | ✗ いいえ | 議論する |
| Vermont lacks a labor pool to build new housing. | → | Proposition 13 limited annual property tax increases in California. | ✗ いいえ | 議論中（1） |