Strukturering · Why do people prefer their own information bubble?

SPØRSMÅLET

Why do people prefer their own information bubble?

Påvirker det ene det andre i betydelig grad? Tre firedeler av de avgitte stemmene avgjør.

Du ser på som gjest. Skriv inn et brukernavn for å bli med og delta.

Spørsmålene fordeles mellom gruppene, så du får dem gruppen din ble tildelt — ikke alle 180.

hvorfor

Ingen kunne svart på flere hundre par. Hvert par går til én gruppe; et par som deler gruppen, sendes så videre til andre grupper, så det kan dukke opp i listen din senere selv om det startet et annet sted. Antallet avgjorte omfatter alle gruppenes arbeid, og derfor stiger det raskere enn din egen liste krymper.

avgjort: 178 / 180 til deg å svare på: 0

Siste opptelling: avgjort 178 · sendt videre til paneler på tvers av grupper 0 · omstridt 0 · under kvorum 2 — paneler trenger minst max(2, 75% av panelet) avgitte stemmer; ditt minste panel har 15 medlemmer.

lukk ✕

There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you → påvirker? → Removing a post makes it famous

Ingenting sagt ennå.

Fullført fase — protokollen over par og stemmer står ovenfor.Sjekk logikken ↗

Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	→	Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	åpent	diskuter
Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	→	Removing a post makes it famous	åpent	diskuter
Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	→	People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	✓ ja	diskuter
Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	→	Schools do not teach how to read a source	✓ ja	diskuter
Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ ja	diskuter
Removing a post makes it famous	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✓ ja	diskuter
A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	→	Removing a post makes it famous	✓ ja	diskuter
Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	→	The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	✓ ja	diskuter
Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	→	Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	✓ ja	diskuter
Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	→	A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	✓ ja	diskuter
Schools do not teach how to read a source	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	→	Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	✗ nei	diskuter
Schools do not teach how to read a source	→	People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	✗ nei	diskuter
People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	→	The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	→	Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Schools do not teach how to read a source	✗ nei	diskuter
Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	→	Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	✗ nei	diskuter
The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	→	People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	✗ nei	diskuter
Schools do not teach how to read a source	→	Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	✗ nei	diskuter
Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	→	People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	→	Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	→	Schools do not teach how to read a source	✗ nei	diskuter
Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	→	The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	→	People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	✗ nei	diskuter
Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	→	Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	→	Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	✗ nei	diskuter
The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	→	Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	→	Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	✗ nei	diskuter
Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	→	Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	→	The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	✗ nei	diskuter
Schools do not teach how to read a source	→	The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	✗ nei	diskuter
People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	→	Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	✗ nei	diskuter
People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	→	Schools do not teach how to read a source	✗ nei	diskuter
The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	→	Schools do not teach how to read a source	✗ nei	diskuter
Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	→	Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	✗ nei	diskuter
Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	→	People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	✗ nei	diskuter
Schools do not teach how to read a source	→	Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	✗ nei	diskuter
Schools do not teach how to read a source	→	Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	✗ nei	diskuter
The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	→	Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	→	The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	✗ nei	diskuter
Schools do not teach how to read a source	→	Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	✗ nei	diskuter
Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	→	The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	✗ nei	diskuter
The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	→	Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	✗ nei	diskuter
People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	✗ nei	diskuter
Schools do not teach how to read a source	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	→	Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	✗ nei	diskuter
The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	→	Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	→	Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	✗ nei	diskuter
Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	→	Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	✗ nei	diskuter
People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	→	Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Schools do not teach how to read a source	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	→	Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	✗ nei	diskuter
Schools do not teach how to read a source	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	→	Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	The council meeting has not been reported by anyone for six years	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
Politics is the only thing left that is free to talk about	→	Schools do not teach how to read a source	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Nobody teaches how to be wrong in public without losing face	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	→	Schools do not teach how to read a source	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Media literacy is taught once, by whoever has a free period	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody has time to be a citizen after two jobs	→	Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	People choose the sources that already agree with them	✗ nei	diskuter
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it	→	Schools do not teach how to read a source	✗ nei	diskuter
People choose the sources that already agree with them	→	People are exhausted and take the version that costs least to hold	✗ nei	diskuter
The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	→	There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	→	A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	✗ nei	diskuter
The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	→	Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	✗ nei	diskuter
Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	→	The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	✗ nei	diskuter
Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	→	The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	✗ nei	diskuter
Removing a post makes it famous	→	A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	✗ nei	diskuter
The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	→	Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	✗ nei	diskuter
Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	→	There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	✗ nei	diskuter
A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	→	The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	→	Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	✗ nei	diskuter
Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	→	Removing a post makes it famous	✗ nei	i fokus ↑ · lukk ✕
The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	→	A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	✗ nei	diskuter
Removing a post makes it famous	→	The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	✗ nei	diskuter
The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	→	There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	✗ nei	diskuter
The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	→	Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	✗ nei	diskuter
The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	→	Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	✗ nei	diskuter
Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	→	Removing a post makes it famous	✗ nei	diskuter
The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
Removing a post makes it famous	→	Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	✗ nei	diskuter
The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	→	Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	→	The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	→	The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Removing a post makes it famous	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	→	The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	✗ nei	diskuter
The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	→	The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	✗ nei	diskuter
A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	→	The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	✗ nei	diskuter
The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	→	The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	→	Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	✗ nei	diskuter
The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	→	Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	✗ nei	diskuter
A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	→	There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	→	The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	✗ nei	diskuter
The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	→	The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	✗ nei	diskuter
The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	→	A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	✗ nei	diskuter
Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	→	A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	→	The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	✗ nei	diskuter
The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	→	Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	✗ nei	diskuter
Removing a post makes it famous	→	The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	✗ nei	diskuter
The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	→	Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	→	The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	✗ nei	diskuter
Removing a post makes it famous	→	Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	✗ nei	diskuter
The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	→	Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	→	Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	✗ nei	diskuter
Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	→	The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	✗ nei	diskuter
The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	→	Removing a post makes it famous	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	→	The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	✗ nei	diskuter
The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	→	A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	✗ nei	diskuter
A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	→	Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	✗ nei	diskuter
The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	→	There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	✗ nei	diskuter
A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	→	Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	✗ nei	diskuter
The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	→	The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	✗ nei	diskuter
The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	→	The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	✗ nei	diskuter
The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	→	Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	✗ nei	diskuter
A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	→	Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	→	There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	✗ nei	diskuter
The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	→	Removing a post makes it famous	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	→	A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	✗ nei	diskuter
Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	→	Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	✗ nei	diskuter
The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	→	Removing a post makes it famous	✗ nei	diskuter
A report takes three days and the post has already done its work	→	The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	✗ nei	diskuter
Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	→	Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	✗ nei	diskuter
Removing a post makes it famous	→	There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	✗ nei	diskuter
Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	→	The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	✗ nei	diskuter
Removing a post makes it famous	→	Nobody outside the company can check whether moderation is even applied	✗ nei	diskuter
Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	→	Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	✗ nei	diskuter
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed	→	Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	✗ nei	diskuter
Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	→	Removing a post makes it famous	✗ nei	diskuter
The problem is not the algorithm, it is that everyone is watching	→	The regional paper is written by people who have never been here	✗ nei	diskuter
Removing a post makes it famous	→	The one place everyone still meets is the school gate	✗ nei	diskuter
There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	→	Children learn what a source is from their parents' feed	✗ nei	diskuter
Distrust of one institution spreads to all of them	→	There is no way to say 'I have changed my mind' without it counting against you	✗ nei	diskuter