PASSPORT · WHAT THIS ROOM DID
Why does a steady life take more than it used to?
Every line is from the record. Nothing is computed for this page, and nothing is smoothed: a short list of disagreements means a room that agreed, not a room whose disagreements were tidied away.
| structures | obstacles |
| opened | 08 Sep 2026 |
| who answered | 30 people in 2 group(s) · participant: 30 |
| wrote blind | not recorded |
| claims | 32 written, 20 structured |
| links certified | 27 |
| rooms on this question | 3 · does not count toward the shared map |
| decided at | 75% of the votes cast |
| sealed | yes, members forgotten |
What it rests on- A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us
- Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut
- The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place
- Every new rule consolidates the market a little more
- A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability
- Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage
What it could not settlePublished as contested, never recorded as a no.
- none: every pair the room reached was settled
What was predicted to followWritten after the map settled. Nobody voted on it.
- Enforce payment terms on large buyers — expected: a small firm can plan on being paid when it was promised — due 22 Jun 2027
What the room would doEach action judged against each root cause, at three quarters of the votes cast.
- Scale compliance to the size of the firm
reduces no root cause - Enforce payment terms on large buyers
reduces: A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us - Tax people and machines on the same basis
reduces no root cause
← the dialogue